Skill UI

Facilitates structured multi-perspective deliberation by simulating distinct thinking archetypes to surface tensions, risks, and actionable synthesis for difficult decisions, trade-offs, creative problems, and strategic choices.

This skill facilitates structured, bidirectional reading and knowledge synthesis for academic texts, theories, and articles. It forces users to first capture the source material's original intent, before critically mapping its relationships, conflicts, and absorptions against the CrossFrame framework. It ensures structured output with clear source boundaries, making it ideal for deep learning and scholarly work.

This advanced trading journal captures the full context of a trade, recording not only the fill price and P&L, but also the initial thesis, the defined plan (stop/target), and the emotional state at the time of entry. It integrates with Notion to log and review trades, grading the quality of decisions and execution against the user's own plan, ensuring users learn from process, not just profit.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of writing a comprehensive, integrative review article for the Academy of Management Annals. It is designed to help users sequence their work—from initial topic selection and creating a formal proposal (the gate) to systematic literature synthesis, building an organizing framework, and final revision. It emphasizes the critical, authoritative 'Annals voice' required for field-advancing academic reviews.

This tool serves as the central entry point and orchestrator for drafting an American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscript. It guides authors through the complex academic publishing lifecycle by determining the paper's specific track (e.g., Regular Article, Synthesis, Registered Report) and its current developmental stage (e.g., Idea, Theory, Data Analysis). It does not draft content; rather, it routes the user to the most relevant sub-skill for the next step in the writing process.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and designing synthesis exhibits for academic literature reviews (e.g., JEL surveys). It teaches how to create 'who-found-what' summary tables, conceptual framework diagrams, and meta-evidence plots that synthesize existing findings across multiple studies, without presenting new, original estimates.

This framework guides researchers in determining if a candidate academic field meets the rigorous criteria—Maturity, Importance, Synthesis Need, and Tractable Scope—required for a major, comprehensive survey article suitable for high-impact journals like the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It helps writers move beyond mere topic ideas to frame a compelling, scholarly argument.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing a survey or review article for the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It guides users through the entire academic writing lifecycle, from initial topic selection and proposing the scope to systematic literature synthesis, structuring the argument, and handling revisions based on editor/referee feedback. It ensures the output is a scholarly synthesis, not a primary research paper.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the critical pre-submission steps for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It ensures that the manuscript is structured as an accessible synthesis for a broad audience, adheres to mandatory AEA disclosure policies, and meets all formatting and submission requirements before emailing the proposal or paper.

A detailed guide for scholars submitting social history manuscripts to the Journal of Social History. It outlines the journal's specific scope—covering everyday life, class, gender, and marginalized experiences—and its high academic bar. It emphasizes the need for an original, argument-driven thesis with methodological self-consciousness, guiding authors on source analysis, historiographical positioning, and adherence to Chicago house style.

This skill guides authors on the specific requirements for submitting manuscripts to Laser & Photonics Reviews. It helps determine if a manuscript should be a critical review or original research, ensuring the work meets the journal's high bar for synthesis, scope, and rigor in laser physics and photonics. Use this when aiming for a review-leaning venue and need to structure your contribution for maximum impact.

This guide teaches advanced academic writers how to structure their papers by positioning their thesis within an ongoing, live scholarly debate. It emphasizes engaging with the strongest, canonical versions of existing views, rather than summarizing literature or attacking strawmen. It helps authors define the precise gap their work fills and state their unique contribution clearly.