Skill UI

This skill is a comprehensive guide designed to help authors position their academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals, specifically focusing on the standards of *Economic Science*. It provides detailed advice on article structure, necessary econometric methodologies (e.g., DID, IV, RDD), core academic contribution points, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring manuscripts meet the high standards of academic rigor and relevance.

This comprehensive guide details the specific, commissioned submission process for the Economic Policy journal. It serves as a crucial preflight checklist for authors, covering all necessary stages: from developing a timely policy pitch and creating a conference-ready draft, to preparing the final camera-ready version. It is vital for authors to understand that EP operates via an invitation system and does not accept open submissions.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing manuscripts for top-tier policy economics journals, such as Economic Policy (EP). It does not replace specialized analysis skills but guides the user through the optimal sequence of specialized steps—from initial topic pitch and literature positioning, through modeling and robustness checks, to managing panel discussions and final revisions. It ensures the paper meets the dual standard of academic rigor and policy accessibility.

This comprehensive guide outlines the mandatory steps for authors preparing their accepted EDBT paper for open-access publication on OpenProceedings.org. It details critical processes, including template adherence, completing the CC-BY-NC-ND open-access license, entering ISBN metadata, de-anonymizing content, and permanently linking artifacts using DOIs, ensuring a smooth publishing workflow.

A comprehensive guide for authors handling decisions from top-tier journals (e.g., EER). This skill guides the revision process when receiving R&R or rejection, teaching how to triage conflicting referee reports, conduct necessary substantive re-analyses, and draft a professional, point-by-point response letter. The focus is on creating a non-defensive, credible document that clearly tracks all changes for the editor.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides researchers through the final essential steps before submitting a manuscript to the European Economic Review (EER). It ensures adherence to Elsevier formatting standards, addresses mandatory replication policies (data/code availability), verifies funding declarations, and confirms all necessary fees and ethical statements are in place. Use this guide as the ultimate final check before pressing submit.

This guide helps researchers determine if their academic topic possesses sufficient breadth of interest for major, general-interest economics journals, such as the European Economic Review (EER). It provides frameworks and checklists to diagnose whether a contribution is too niche or if it can be successfully reframed to appeal to a non-specialist audience, ensuring it passes initial desk-reject filters.

This comprehensive workflow router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of preparing a manuscript for the European Economic Review (EER). It systematically diagnoses bottlenecks and maps the optimal sequence of specialized skills—from refining the general-interest topic, building causal identification, strengthening theory models, checking robustness, to mastering the writing style and managing the final submission package. It ensures the academic output meets the high standards of a top-tier economics journal.

This advanced routing skill guides researchers through the complex process of submitting manuscripts in agriculture, environment, and earth science. It does not replace a single journal profile, but rather classifies the work by sub-field, contribution type, and evidence shape. By evaluating pre-routing gates (e.g., evidence strength, scale match), it determines the best specialist venue for re-framing and submission.

A comprehensive workflow guide for routing clinical medicine manuscripts. It classifies studies by specialty, study design (RCT, observational, review), and evidence strength, helping authors select the optimal journal venue (e.g., JAMA, Lancet) for submission and re-framing. It emphasizes matching the manuscript to specialized society guidelines and evidence hierarchy.

This skill is a comprehensive routing guide for scholarly manuscripts in the humanities. It assists users by classifying submissions based on sub-field (e.g., history, philosophy, literature), contribution type (argument, theory, interpretation), and methodological approach. It helps determine the optimal target journal among various specialized and generalist venues, ensuring the manuscript is correctly framed for scholarly review and fit.

This guide provides strict stylistic and structural guidelines for drafting scientific manuscripts intended for Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL). It focuses on transforming regional descriptions into process-focused arguments, managing word count, and ensuring clarity for a highly cross-disciplinary scientific readership.