Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the complex process of revising manuscripts after receiving multiple, demanding expert reports (R&R). It outlines strategic approaches for structuring the response letter, handling conflicting reviewer demands, and rigorously protecting the core historical argument while maintaining academic anonymity.

This skill is designed to polish and refine academic manuscripts intended for the American Historical Review (AHR). It focuses on enhancing the clarity, narrative flow, and authoritative voice of the prose, ensuring the work is accessible and engaging for historians across all subfields. It tightens the overall readability, minimizes unnecessary jargon, and helps frame evidence without altering the core arguments or academic content.

A guide for managing the length and density of advanced pure mathematics manuscripts. This skill helps authors eliminate bloat, padding, and unnecessary background while ensuring that the core mathematical proof remains complete, rigorous, and gap-free. It is essential for refining long-form academic papers for top-tier journals.

This guide provides a comprehensive structure and best practices for drafting academic cover letters and pre-submission inquiries for high-impact scientific journals, such as Cancer Cell. It covers essential elements including articulating the core advance, justifying journal fit, detailing evidence strength, managing reviewer suggestions, and adhering to professional submission standards, ensuring your manuscript stands out to editors.

This guide assists researchers in transforming empirical findings into high-level, institutionally relevant policy implications for top-tier academic journals (e.g., finance and economics). It teaches how to shift focus from actionable 'recommendations' to theoretical 'implications,' ensuring the policy section is evidence-backed, macro-level, and deeply integrated with the paper's core theory and Chinese context.

This skill is a comprehensive guide designed to help authors position their academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals, specifically focusing on the standards of *Economic Science*. It provides detailed advice on article structure, necessary econometric methodologies (e.g., DID, IV, RDD), core academic contribution points, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring manuscripts meet the high standards of academic rigor and relevance.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This guide details the necessary workflow for organizing supplementary academic content, such as code, extensive methodologies, and raw data, across various conference submission phases. It emphasizes placing only core arguments in the main body, keeping sensitive materials anonymized in the mirror, and preparing a staging shelf for efficient revision.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors submitting technical research papers, clarifying how to split content between the main 18-page body and supplementary artifacts. It stresses that all decision-critical evidence, such as threat models and core results, must reside within the reviewed body to ensure reviewers can adequately evaluate the work without relying on accessing supplemental materials.

A comprehensive guide for polishing academic manuscripts intended for the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG). It instructs authors on structuring arguments around core growth mechanisms, translating raw econometric coefficients into meaningful growth language (e.g., convergence, productivity), and applying specific metadata and citation standards (APA, JEL codes) required by top-tier journals in development economics.

This skill guides researchers through drafting a robust and credible response to major academic revisions (R&R) from top-tier journals, particularly in institutional economics. It teaches how to systematically decode editor feedback, separate core conceptual challenges from technical gaps, and structure a point-by-point reply that addresses deal-breakers effectively, ensuring the response is substantive and highly responsive.

This guide provides rigorous standards for creating academic tables and figures (exhibits) for scholarly manuscripts. It ensures results are self-contained, accessible, and strictly compliant with APA 7th edition formatting, while adhering to strict journal page limits. Focuses on presentation quality, reproducibility, and distinguishing core findings from supplemental material.