Skill UI

This tool generates a detailed, local 'receipt' or impact report of all Claude Code activity recorded in local session transcripts. It cross-references this data with your local Git history to provide a quantifiable measure of effort and project contribution. Ideal for performance reviews, budget justifications, or self-auditing usage.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of writing a comprehensive, integrative review article for the Academy of Management Annals. It is designed to help users sequence their work—from initial topic selection and creating a formal proposal (the gate) to systematic literature synthesis, building an organizing framework, and final revision. It emphasizes the critical, authoritative 'Annals voice' required for field-advancing academic reviews.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for refining academic prose specifically for major psychology review publications. It teaches authors how to achieve an authoritative yet accessible voice, shifting the focus from merely listing studies to constructing a deep, argumentative narrative (the 'spine'). It is crucial for structuring abstracts, introductions, and future-directions sections to engage both specialists and general psychology readers.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on assessing the suitability and preparing manuscripts for Chemical Society Reviews (Chem Soc Rev). It covers journal positioning, structural requirements (e.g., tutorial vs. critical review), method-and-evidence bar, house style, and a detailed pre-submission checklist to minimize desk-reject risks. Use this tool when targeting this specific RSC venue or comparing it against other review journals.

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers preparing liver biology or disease studies for submission to Hepatology (AASLD). It meticulously reviews the journal's scope, evidence bar, reporting guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, STROBE), and required structure. It helps authors determine if their mechanistic or clinical work is rigorous enough and appropriately framed for a top-tier, international audience.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and designing synthesis exhibits for academic literature reviews (e.g., JEL surveys). It teaches how to create 'who-found-what' summary tables, conceptual framework diagrams, and meta-evidence plots that synthesize existing findings across multiple studies, without presenting new, original estimates.

This guide provides a highly structured framework for writing literature reviews for top international economics journals. It emphasizes moving beyond merely listing localized findings, focusing instead on establishing a clear dialogue with global academic classics, frontier research (e.g., GVC, global finance), and defining the paper's unique marginal contribution within the international academic lineage.

This skill guides authors on the specific requirements for submitting manuscripts to Laser & Photonics Reviews. It helps determine if a manuscript should be a critical review or original research, ensuring the work meets the journal's high bar for synthesis, scope, and rigor in laser physics and photonics. Use this when aiming for a review-leaning venue and need to structure your contribution for maximum impact.

This guide teaches advanced academic writers how to structure their papers by positioning their thesis within an ongoing, live scholarly debate. It emphasizes engaging with the strongest, canonical versions of existing views, rather than summarizing literature or attacking strawmen. It helps authors define the precise gap their work fills and state their unique contribution clearly.