Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive, backward planning workflow for preparing and submitting a technical paper to the CoNEXT conference. It outlines the distinct December and June submission cycles, covering essential milestones such as artifact preparation, mandatory registration, major revisions, and the final camera-ready stages, ensuring authors track every step from initial concept to final publication.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for developing manuscripts for top-tier policy economics journals, such as Economic Policy (EP). It does not replace specialized analysis skills but guides the user through the optimal sequence of specialized steps—from initial topic pitch and literature positioning, through modeling and robustness checks, to managing panel discussions and final revisions. It ensures the paper meets the dual standard of academic rigor and policy accessibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors handling decisions from top-tier journals (e.g., EER). This skill guides the revision process when receiving R&R or rejection, teaching how to triage conflicting referee reports, conduct necessary substantive re-analyses, and draft a professional, point-by-point response letter. The focus is on creating a non-defensive, credible document that clearly tracks all changes for the editor.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors responding to peer reviews at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches how to interpret reviews as a 'bin-sorting' problem, structure persuasive rebuttals, address specific technical objections (measurement, design), and convert vague revision conditions into a concrete, actionable resubmission contract and plan.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

This comprehensive guide provides a backward-planning workflow for submitting an Empirical Software Engineering (SE) paper to FSE. It manages the entire academic publication lifecycle, from initial venue confirmation and evidence lock to submission, major revision, and final presentation. It outlines critical milestones, deadlines, and potential failure modes to ensure a structured and successful academic publishing process.

This tool serves as the central orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to Global Change Biology (GCB). It guides authors through the entire research lifecycle—from initial idea generation to final revision—by determining the appropriate article type and identifying the correct next step (skill). It ensures the manuscript maintains a mechanistic focus on global change impacts.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire publication lifecycle, from initial idea generation to final revision. It determines the correct stage, appropriate format (Research Article, Perspective), and routes the user to the necessary sub-skill, ensuring that the work maintains a strong focus on human and policy dimensions, rather than solely environmental results.

A comprehensive guide to navigating the intensive, multi-round post-acceptance editing cycle for academic journals. It outlines the distinct stages—from substantive argument strengthening to technical line edits and final Bluebook proofing—ensuring submissions stay on track through the required rounds and into print.

This guide details the necessary workflow for organizing supplementary academic content, such as code, extensive methodologies, and raw data, across various conference submission phases. It emphasizes placing only core arguments in the main body, keeping sensitive materials anonymized in the mirror, and preparing a staging shelf for efficient revision.

This detailed project management skill provides a comprehensive, backward-planning guide for submitting to highly structured academic conferences, such as HPCA. It maps out critical milestones—from initial venue fit and evidence locking to review, revision, and final camera-ready submission—while identifying common failure modes and coordination requirements to maximize acceptance chances.

This comprehensive router guides authors through the entire writing and revision lifecycle for submissions to Human Relations (HR). It diagnoses common academic bottlenecks—from topic selection and theoretical development to data analysis and rebuttal strategies—ensuring the manuscript meets the rigorous interdisciplinary standards of the journal. It acts as a navigational map, suggesting the optimal sequence of specialized skills.