Skill UI

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting The Innovation journal with cross-disciplinary breakthrough manuscripts. It assesses the journal's specific fit, rigorous method and evidence bar, required structure, and house style, ensuring the work is scientifically significant and legible to multiple fields. Use this to optimize your submission before official guidelines.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their microbial ecology manuscript is suitable for The ISME Journal. It details the journal's focus on ecological and evolutionary mechanisms, outlining expectations for multi-omics integration, rigorous experimental design, and high-level evidence. Use this skill for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and understanding the required standards for publication.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors assessing the fit and framing of metabolic, endocrine, or diabetes research for The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. It outlines the journal's specific requirements, favoring major randomized trials, large prospective cohorts, and population-level epidemiological studies with clear international clinical or policy relevance. It covers method standards, reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), and official submission checklists. Note: This is a venue-fit aid, not clinical or regulatory advice.

A comprehensive project management layer designed for navigating the entire academic conference lifecycle. It guides authors through critical phases, including topic selection, paper drafting, rigorous review response, camera-ready submission, and final presentation. The workflow emphasizes meticulous planning, role assignment, and maintaining academic integrity to prevent common project failures.

This comprehensive guide manages the end-to-end project lifecycle for submitting a systems paper to the UIST conference. It structures the demanding timeline, detailing milestones from abstract submission and hardware development to video production, rebuttal, and final camera-ready submission, while also providing crucial risk mitigation strategies.

This comprehensive guide details the academic submission lifecycle for USENIX Security. It maps out the multi-stage review pipeline, from initial submission through early rejection to final notification. It critically updates authors on the current decision vocabulary (e.g., Shepherd Approval, retired major revisions), emphasizing mandatory review foci like ethics adequacy, threat-model realism, and openness posture for strategic planning.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage submission process for USENIX Security Symposium papers. It covers mandatory formatting rules, including the 13-page main body and required appendices for Ethical Considerations and Open Science. The guide also details critical steps for maintaining double-blind anonymity, managing complex HotCRP deadlines, and avoiding early rejection pitfalls.

This comprehensive guide provides an end-to-end planning framework for USENIX Security Symposium submissions. It assists researchers in selecting the optimal submission cycle, mapping backward timelines from key milestones (like registration), assigning ownership for venue-specific risks (e.g., ethics, reproducibility), and coordinating through the complex post-submission decision process (Accept/Reject).

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers, specifically tailored for the IEEE VIS conference cycle. It maps out all critical milestones, from initial area selection and abstract submission through to conditional acceptance revisions and final camera-ready preparation. Use this skill to responsibly plan for the annual cycle, manage reviewers' expectations, and mitigate common submission risks.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.

This comprehensive guide manages the entire project lifecycle for academic conference submissions, such as VLDB. It provides detailed methodologies for initial volume planning, computing optimal submission timelines (month-picking), coordinating group author contributions, and managing the revision bandwidth. It is essential for maintaining rigorous scheduling and mitigating the risk of missed deadlines in fast-paced research environments.

A comprehensive guide for transforming an accepted, anonymous conference paper into the final, public version of record for WACV. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization, incorporating final revisions, ensuring dual publication compliance (IEEE Xplore & CVF), fulfilling data/code release obligations, and preparing the presentation material.