Skill UI

A guide for structuring academic manuscripts that argue their contribution within a broader, comparative, and theory-driven European sociological debate. It helps authors transition from writing a national case study to establishing a portable, contestable claim that advances cross-national theory, focusing on identifying theoretical disagreements and the specific 'move' the research makes.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process at the European Sociological Review (ESR). It helps authors anticipate reviewer critiques on comparative design, quantitative modeling, and theoretical contribution, ensuring the manuscript is structured for success before submission.

This router guides authors through the complex submission process for rigorous quantitative sociology journals (ESR). It diagnoses the manuscript's stage (Idea, Article, Comment, Data Brief) and methodological shape (comparative, longitudinal, multilevel), ensuring the user is routed to the correct specialized skill set, rather than following a linear process. It is an orchestrator for academic research development.

A comprehensive guide for revising academic papers submitted to FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency). It instructs authors on how to frame socio-technical contributions to be legible to a mixed panel of computer scientists, lawyers, and social scientists. Focus areas include scoping claims to specific populations, explicitly arguing adverse impacts, and making interdisciplinary concepts native to the text.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire writing lifecycle by first enforcing a critical 'scope gate' (checking for field-based, multi-environment relevance). It then intelligently routes the user based on the project stage, article type (e.g., Original Research, Review, Opinion), and necessary steps, ensuring the manuscript is scientifically viable before any content drafting begins.

This skill provides a rigorous review pass for drafting or polishing academic manuscripts for general agronomists. It enforces strict structural discipline (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion), ensuring the writing is quantified, generalizable, and scientifically interpretive. Ideal for refining abstracts, highlights, and discussions where the goal is to elevate local findings into broad, theory-driven scientific contributions.

A comprehensive preflight guide for submitting academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for Financial Management (FMA) via the FMA/ScholarOne platform. It details critical steps, including fee payment, genre-specific formatting rules (anonymization, style guides), originality declarations, and the correct two-stage submission workflow to ensure manuscripts are properly processed and maximize acceptance chances.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of submitting a manuscript to the Financial Management (FM) journal. It is designed to diagnose the current bottleneck and sequence the specialized steps needed, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature positioning to empirical design, writing refinement, and rebuttal letter strategies. It ensures the work meets the high standards of applied finance journals.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage process for submitting camera-ready versions for a top-tier academic conference like FOCS. It details the critical difference between the official IEEE proceedings and the public arXiv/ECCC full version. Key steps include de-anonymization, maintaining source consistency across both documents, updating author details, and preparing for conference talks and awards eligibility.

This guide addresses the unique challenge of structuring very long technical papers for academic venues like FOCS, where the committee reads a summary (the 'window') and expert reviewers must read the full proof (the 'supplementary'). It details best practices for organizing discretionary material, implementing robust pointer discipline, and ensuring self-containment to satisfy both quick-read and deep-dive readers.

A comprehensive framework designed for academic authors to assess whether their management or economics manuscript aligns with the scope and standards of specific high-impact journals. This skill guides users on critical elements such as theoretical contribution requirements, international framing, double-blind review rules, abstract length, and common rejection pitfalls, significantly increasing the chances of successful publication.

This comprehensive skill acts as a pre-submission positioning tool for manuscripts targeting the Forum on Science and Technology in China. It helps researchers evaluate if their work aligns with the journal's scope, which covers technology strategy, industrial policy, and innovation systems. The guide details required methodologies, structural improvements, and common rejection pitfalls to maximize the manuscript's chances of acceptance.