Skill UI

A comprehensive, final-gate audit guide for submitting papers to major robotics conferences like ICRA using the PaperPlaza system. It details mandatory technical specifications, including page limits (6 content + 2 refs), IEEE two-column compliance, double-anonymous rules, video attachment specs, and critical deadlines. Essential reading to prevent submission rejection or administrative disqualification.

This guide details the mandatory steps required after acceptance to prepare a paper for IEEE Xplore publication. It covers critical technical requirements, including full de-anonymization, adherence to the IEEEtran format and page limits, completing the electronic Copyright Form (eCF), passing PDF eXpress validation, and integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep.

This guide provides expert strategies for condensing complex technical research papers into strict academic page limits (e.g., four pages). It focuses on achieving the 'one-pass property' for expert reviewers by optimizing the abstract, introduction, methods, and results sections. Learn how to use protocol one-liners, consolidate tables, and structure claims for maximum rigor and impact under severe page constraints.

A comprehensive checklist for the final pre-deadline audit of a major academic conference submission (ISCA). It covers the two-step abstract and paper submission process, strict formatting rules (11-page limit, unlimited references), double-blind anonymization techniques, and essential steps for completing the HotCRP portal. Use this guide to ensure your paper meets all technical and procedural requirements before the deadline.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors submitting technical research papers, clarifying how to split content between the main 18-page body and supplementary artifacts. It stresses that all decision-critical evidence, such as threat models and core results, must reside within the reviewed body to ensure reviewers can adequately evaluate the work without relying on accessing supplemental materials.

Designed for authors submitting to general-interest journals like JEEA. This skill helps stress-test a manuscript by simulating the two-gate decision process: the co-editor's fit assessment (desk-reject risk) and the referees' technical critiques. It guides authors on pre-empting common objections—such as general interest lack, identification weakness, or model fragility—by strategically framing the paper before submission.

A comprehensive preflight guide for authors submitting to the Journal of Economic Theory (JET). It verifies critical technical formatting, reference compliance, ethical disclosures (AI use, data policy), and structural requirements necessary for successful submission via Elsevier Editorial Manager.

This comprehensive guide provides a final preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to academic journals like JFI via Editorial Manager. It covers mandatory components, including the submission fee, abstract word limits, keyword requirements, Generative AI declarations, and Option C data plans. It serves as a critical gatekeeping tool to ensure the manuscript meets all technical and procedural standards before final submission.

This skill guides researchers through drafting a robust and credible response to major academic revisions (R&R) from top-tier journals, particularly in institutional economics. It teaches how to systematically decode editor feedback, separate core conceptual challenges from technical gaps, and structure a point-by-point reply that addresses deal-breakers effectively, ensuring the response is substantive and highly responsive.

A comprehensive workflow guide for managing the entire academic journal submission process. It details the nine critical stages, from initial topic selection and writing to submission, and navigating the rigorous initial, external, and final review rounds. It provides milestones, timelines, and risk management strategies essential for technical writers and researchers.

This comprehensive guide provides the final mandatory preflight checks before submitting a manuscript to Mind via ScholarOne. It details crucial guidelines for triple-anonymous review, covering word limits (approx. 8,000 words), abstract length (50–200 words), mandatory line numbering, and adherence to the MIND house style. Using this checklist ensures your submission meets all academic and formatting requirements, preventing rejection due to technical or anonymity failures.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide and checklist for authors aiming to submit catalysis research to Nature Catalysis. It assesses not only the technical scope (heterogeneous, homogeneous, electrocatalysis) but also the mechanistic depth, broad significance, required evidence (in situ spectroscopy, DFT), and adherence to the journal's strict house style and formatting guidelines.