Skill UI

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final review process before submitting manuscripts to Field Crops Research (FCR). It ensures adherence to strict journal requirements, covering scope confirmation, formatting rules (abstract word count, highlights structure), comprehensive reporting (weather vs. phenology, statistics), and mandatory declarations (data availability, AI use). Use this guide to minimize rejection risk and streamline the submission process.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscripts. It guides researchers through the entire writing lifecycle by first enforcing a critical 'scope gate' (checking for field-based, multi-environment relevance). It then intelligently routes the user based on the project stage, article type (e.g., Original Research, Review, Opinion), and necessary steps, ensuring the manuscript is scientifically viable before any content drafting begins.

This skill provides a rigorous review pass for drafting or polishing academic manuscripts for general agronomists. It enforces strict structural discipline (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion), ensuring the writing is quantified, generalizable, and scientifically interpretive. Ideal for refining abstracts, highlights, and discussions where the goal is to elevate local findings into broad, theory-driven scientific contributions.

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a scholarly rebuttal and response letter after receiving conditional acceptance or major revisions from a journal. It advises researchers on prioritizing editor feedback, strategically addressing referee comments (triage), sharpening the paper's general interest framing, and maintaining a professional, evidence-based tone. It emphasizes focusing on core credibility and impact rather than merely adding robustness tables.

A comprehensive preflight guide for submitting academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for Financial Management (FMA) via the FMA/ScholarOne platform. It details critical steps, including fee payment, genre-specific formatting rules (anonymization, style guides), originality declarations, and the correct two-stage submission workflow to ensure manuscripts are properly processed and maximize acceptance chances.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of submitting a manuscript to the Financial Management (FM) journal. It is designed to diagnose the current bottleneck and sequence the specialized steps needed, covering everything from initial topic selection and literature positioning to empirical design, writing refinement, and rebuttal letter strategies. It ensures the work meets the high standards of applied finance journals.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage process for submitting camera-ready versions for a top-tier academic conference like FOCS. It details the critical difference between the official IEEE proceedings and the public arXiv/ECCC full version. Key steps include de-anonymization, maintaining source consistency across both documents, updating author details, and preparing for conference talks and awards eligibility.

This guide addresses the unique challenge of structuring very long technical papers for academic venues like FOCS, where the committee reads a summary (the 'window') and expert reviewers must read the full proof (the 'supplementary'). It details best practices for organizing discretionary material, implementing robust pointer discipline, and ensuring self-containment to satisfy both quick-read and deep-dive readers.

A comprehensive framework designed for academic authors to assess whether their management or economics manuscript aligns with the scope and standards of specific high-impact journals. This skill guides users on critical elements such as theoretical contribution requirements, international framing, double-blind review rules, abstract length, and common rejection pitfalls, significantly increasing the chances of successful publication.

This comprehensive skill acts as a pre-submission positioning tool for manuscripts targeting the Forum on Science and Technology in China. It helps researchers evaluate if their work aligns with the journal's scope, which covers technology strategy, industrial policy, and innovation systems. The guide details required methodologies, structural improvements, and common rejection pitfalls to maximize the manuscript's chances of acceptance.

This comprehensive guide provides a backward-planning workflow for submitting an Empirical Software Engineering (SE) paper to FSE. It manages the entire academic publication lifecycle, from initial venue confirmation and evidence lock to submission, major revision, and final presentation. It outlines critical milestones, deadlines, and potential failure modes to ensure a structured and successful academic publishing process.

A comprehensive skill for assessing the fit, framing, and structural requirements for manuscripts targeting Gastroenterology or similar GI/hepatology venues. It analyzes scope, required methodology standards (e.g., for RCTs, microbiome studies), house style, and official submission checklists, ensuring authors meet the high academic bar for publication in digestive and liver sciences.