Skill UI

This skill performs in-depth literature reviews across complex communications domains, including 5G/6G, Wi-Fi, satellite networking, and advanced protocols. It systematically searches user-defined knowledge bases (Zotero, Obsidian, local files) and major academic databases (IEEE, ACM, ScienceDirect) to provide comprehensive survey summaries, related work analyses, and technical landscape overviews.

A comprehensive knowledge-base-first skill designed for deep literature reviews in advanced communication domains. Use it for topics like 4G/5G/6G, wireless networking, satellite communications, Wi-Fi, routing protocols, and cross-layer optimization. It systematically searches structured academic databases (IEEE, ACM, Zotero, etc.) to provide related work, survey papers, and landscape summaries.

This expert system is designed to act as an Arch Linux specialist, diagnosing and resolving complex system issues using best practices for rolling-release distributions. It guides users through step-by-step triage plans, leveraging native tools like pacman, systemctl, and journalctl. It provides actionable, copy-paste-ready commands for remediation, verification, and cleanup, ensuring stable system recovery.

A comprehensive guide for computer science authors targeting high-performance parallel and distributed computing venues like HPDC. It assists in conference fit evaluation, manuscript re-framing (from journal/arXiv to conference narrative), identifying evidence gaps, and structuring contributions for optimal review success in cloud/HPC systems and distributed settings. Ideal for determining submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting ACM MobiCom. It assists in conference fit assessment, manuscript re-framing, and strengthening the evidence base for mobile networking and wireless systems papers. Learn how to position your work against specific venue requirements, distinguish contributions (e.g., networking vs. platform), and structure your paper for optimal review impact.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for positioning mobile and embedded systems manuscripts for ACM MobiSys. It details venue fit, contribution framing, necessary real-device evidence, and how to differentiate the work from related conferences (e.g., MobiCom, UbiComp). Use this when your research value depends on surviving real-world device constraints, sensing, or edge computing environments.

This guide helps authors assess the suitability and optimal framing of their computer animation manuscript for the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA). It provides strategic advice on required evidence, scope calibration, contribution types (e.g., physics simulation, character motion, crowds), and how to position the work against top-tier CS conference standards. Use this when submitting animation-related research.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research manuscripts for the ACM SIGGRAPH I3D Symposium. It covers core topics like real-time rendering, interactive 3D systems, and GPU algorithms, advising authors on how to frame their work, structure evidence, and compare it against related academic venues to maximize submission success.

This guide details the process of packaging and evaluating academic artifacts for ACM CCS conferences. It outlines the criteria for earning specific ACM badges (e.g., Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) by ensuring that supporting evidence—such as exploits, defenses, and measurement pipelines—is turnkey, reproducible, and rigorously documented for the review committee. It covers best practices for artifact planning, handling sensitive material, and justifying any withheld components.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting networking research to CoNEXT. It outlines best practices for achieving technical reproducibility, focusing on pinning traces, configurations, environments, and pipelines. Learn the critical timeline for optional ACM badging and how to maintain an honest data-availability posture for robust academic review.

This comprehensive audit guide assists researchers in preparing papers for CoNEXT submission. It covers critical workflow stages, including choosing the correct submission cycle (December or June), adhering to ACM acmart formatting and strict page budgets, managing the two-step registration process, ensuring double-anonymous review compliance, and implementing essential security checks to prevent identity leaks in artifacts and metadata.