Skill UI

This advanced skill details dual-use security techniques for analyzing protected binaries, conducting malware analysis, and performing authorized penetration testing. It strictly mandates that users confirm explicit written authorization, adhere to defined scope, and ensure legal compliance (e.g., CFAA, DMCA). Use cases include CTF competitions, academic research, and internal security auditing, emphasizing defensive recommendations and evidence preservation.

This advanced skill details dual-use security techniques for analyzing protected binaries, conducting malware analysis, and performing authorized penetration testing. It strictly mandates that users confirm explicit written authorization, adhere to defined scope, and ensure legal compliance (e.g., CFAA, DMCA). Use cases include CTF competitions, academic research, and internal security auditing, emphasizing defensive recommendations and evidence preservation.

This skill performs in-depth literature reviews across complex communications domains, including 5G/6G, Wi-Fi, satellite networking, and advanced protocols. It systematically searches user-defined knowledge bases (Zotero, Obsidian, local files) and major academic databases (IEEE, ACM, ScienceDirect) to provide comprehensive survey summaries, related work analyses, and technical landscape overviews.

A comprehensive knowledge-base-first skill designed for deep literature reviews in advanced communication domains. Use it for topics like 4G/5G/6G, wireless networking, satellite communications, Wi-Fi, routing protocols, and cross-layer optimization. It systematically searches structured academic databases (IEEE, ACM, Zotero, etc.) to provide related work, survey papers, and landscape summaries.

A comprehensive guide for positioning research manuscripts for the ACM SIGGRAPH I3D Symposium. It covers core topics like real-time rendering, interactive 3D systems, and GPU algorithms, advising authors on how to frame their work, structure evidence, and compare it against related academic venues to maximize submission success.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier electronics journals. It provides detailed methodologies on structuring experimental chapters, ensuring comparison fairness, achieving statistical rigor, and presenting reproducible results to withstand demanding peer review scrutiny.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC). It helps assess the fit, scope, and required evidence for applied security papers, ensuring the manuscript is properly reframed from academic theory to deployable, operational defenses. Use this tool for venue selection and submission strategy.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Biomaterials journal. It emphasizes the journal's core requirement: dual rigor. A successful submission must integrate thorough materials design and characterization with genuine biological evaluation (in vitro/in vivo), crucially establishing a mechanistic link between material properties and biological outcomes. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and pre-submission self-assessment against high academic standards.

This guide details the process of packaging and evaluating academic artifacts for ACM CCS conferences. It outlines the criteria for earning specific ACM badges (e.g., Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) by ensuring that supporting evidence—such as exploits, defenses, and measurement pipelines—is turnkey, reproducible, and rigorously documented for the review committee. It covers best practices for artifact planning, handling sensitive material, and justifying any withheld components.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting networking research to CoNEXT. It outlines best practices for achieving technical reproducibility, focusing on pinning traces, configurations, environments, and pipelines. Learn the critical timeline for optional ACM badging and how to maintain an honest data-availability posture for robust academic review.

This comprehensive guide details the academic review pipeline for CoNEXT conference submissions. It covers double-anonymous double-blind review, the two-round TPC process, and the critical nature of the one-shot "major revision," which functions similarly to a journal's revise-and-resubmit cycle. It provides authors with strategic insights to structure their research for rigorous academic scrutiny.