Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides rigorous standards for advanced materials manuscripts. It mandates that structure–property claims must be validated through multiple, complementary characterization techniques (triangulation). It also details best practices for benchmarking against the state-of-the-art, ensuring reproducibility, and correctly partitioning core information between the main text and supplementary materials.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in electronics and signal processing preparing submissions to Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It outlines best practices for proactively structuring, documenting, and disclosing research artifacts—including code, datasets, and hardware designs—to maximize the paper's credibility and chances of acceptance, even without mandatory journal badges. Covers anonymization, reproducibility standards, and proper disclosure in the manuscript.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for ensuring scientific reproducibility in technical papers, particularly for electronics and information processing fields. It covers the critical pillars of documentation: environment setup, data sourcing and preprocessing, full algorithmic disclosure (including pseudo-code and hyperparameters), and robust statistical evaluation. By adopting these standards, authors can transform their work from potentially unverifiable results into credible, verifiable scientific contributions suitable for top-tier journals.

This guide helps researchers determine the suitability of their energy-related manuscripts for the Applied Energy journal. It shifts the focus from single-device performance or component novelty to generalizable, systems-level insights. Key areas include energy-systems modeling, decarbonization pathways, techno-economic analysis (TEA), life cycle assessment (LCA), and assessing integrated energy transitions across sectors.

This guide provides expert principles for designing and auditing system-level experiments in computer architecture (e.g., for ASPLOS-level conferences). It details the proper usage of various instruments—from real silicon and FPGAs to cycle-level simulators and analytical models—ensuring that every claim is matched to a valid, stated error model. It emphasizes workload selection, establishing strong baselines, performing rigorous ablation studies, and honestly reporting measurement noise and limitations to maintain scientific credibility.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Biomaterials journal. It emphasizes the journal's core requirement: dual rigor. A successful submission must integrate thorough materials design and characterization with genuine biological evaluation (in vitro/in vivo), crucially establishing a mechanistic link between material properties and biological outcomes. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and pre-submission self-assessment against high academic standards.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting networking research to CoNEXT. It outlines best practices for achieving technical reproducibility, focusing on pinning traces, configurations, environments, and pipelines. Learn the critical timeline for optional ACM badging and how to maintain an honest data-availability posture for robust academic review.

Provides guidelines for creating robust, verifiable, and reusable Electronic Design Automation (EDA) artifacts for submission to academic conferences like DAC. The focus shifts from chasing conference badges to ensuring community trust and scientific reproducibility. Key elements include pinning the toolchain, using standard benchmarks, providing clear setup instructions, and archiving the release in a DOI-issuing repository.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist for evaluating Electronic Design Automation (EDA) research manuscripts for top-tier conferences like DAC. It emphasizes the necessity of using standard, recognized benchmark suites (e.g., ISPD, EPFL, TAU), comparing results against the true State-of-the-Art (SOTA), reporting full PPA metrics and runtime, and implementing ablation studies to ensure fairness, reproducibility, and generalizability, especially for ML-based methods.

A comprehensive guide for establishing research reproducibility in Electronic Design Automation (EDA). It details best practices for pinning benchmark suites, disclosing specific tool versions (open/commercial), documenting technology nodes (PDKs), and handling stochastic data flows (seeds, variance). Essential for ensuring that semiconductor design claims and ML-for-EDA results are credible and verifiable by the academic community.

A detailed model of the ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) research manuscript review process. This guide explains the double-blind, TPC-driven, and single-shot nature of the evaluation, emphasizing the critical balance between genuine novelty and measured Quality-of-Results (QoR). It outlines the high standards for evidence fairness, benchmark credibility, and ablation studies required for acceptance, differentiating DAC's approach from architecture and software venues.