Skill UI

This skill provides expert-level diagnostic capabilities for complex distributed systems. It specializes in analyzing production incidents, identifying deep root causes, and designing comprehensive observability solutions. Use this when investigating recurring errors, reviewing system logs/traces, and implementing preventative reliability measures.

This specialized skill acts as an expert AI auditor for Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) compliance. It is designed to review critical records, including HACCP plans, Preventive Controls, and Supply Chain documentation for food processing facilities. Use it to simulate FDA inspections, identify compliance gaps (such as missing CCPs or inadequate corrective actions), and receive actionable guidance to ensure the highest standards of food safety.

This skill guides users through performing comprehensive threat modeling using the OWASP Threat Dragon tool. It covers creating Data Flow Diagrams (DFD), identifying vulnerabilities using established methodologies like STRIDE and LINDDUN, defining mitigations, and generating formal PDF reports. Ideal for secure design reviews, architecture validation, and achieving GRC compliance.

A comprehensive knowledge-base-first skill designed for deep literature reviews in advanced communication domains. Use it for topics like 4G/5G/6G, wireless networking, satellite communications, Wi-Fi, routing protocols, and cross-layer optimization. It systematically searches structured academic databases (IEEE, ACM, Zotero, etc.) to provide related work, survey papers, and landscape summaries.

This skill activates the P7 Senior Engineer mode, designed for rigorous, solution-driven execution under P8 supervision. It is used when the user explicitly requests 'P7模式' or when invoked as a sub-task executor by P8. The process involves three key stages: designing a detailed implementation plan and impact analysis, executing the core coding, and finally, completing a mandatory three-question self-review, ensuring high quality and comprehensive verification.

This skill performs a rigorous, adversarial review of implemented code. It verifies that the task implementation is complete, structurally sound, respects defined boundaries, and aligns perfectly with approved requirements and design specifications. Use it after an implementer finishes work, or before final acceptance, to ensure code quality and architectural integrity.

This skill facilitates a rigorous, documentation-anchored design review session. It challenges a proposed plan by cross-referencing it against the project's established domain glossary (CONTEXT.md), historical architectural decisions (ADRs), and the current codebase. It forces the user to resolve ambiguities, define precise terminology, and validate design trade-offs using concrete scenarios, ensuring all decisions are captured and documented inline.

Generates a comprehensive, structured, and blameless incident postmortem document. This skill is designed for Root Cause Analysis (RCA), P1/P2 incident reviews, and outage reports, ensuring the focus remains on systemic gaps and preventative action items rather than individual blame. It guides the user through gathering all necessary details, from the timeline and impact to defining concrete action owners and due dates.

A structured presentation deck designed for rigorous review of safety incidents, security risks, and policy compliance. It utilizes distinct visual cues, including hazard stripes, L1/L2/L3 severity tiers, and dedicated code blocks for policy review (e.g., YAML). Ideal for red team exercises, post-incident reviews, and high-stakes technical briefings.

A detailed model of the ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) research manuscript review process. This guide explains the double-blind, TPC-driven, and single-shot nature of the evaluation, emphasizing the critical balance between genuine novelty and measured Quality-of-Results (QoR). It outlines the high standards for evidence fairness, benchmark credibility, and ablation studies required for acceptance, differentiating DAC's approach from architecture and software venues.

This guide assists in structuring the design of Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) studies, including lab, mesocosm, field sampling, or modeling experiments. It ensures methodological rigor by planning for environmental relevance, necessary controls (e.g., abiotic loss, sorption), proper replication, mass/energy balance, and a comprehensive QA/QC plan from the outset, helping the study withstand expert peer review.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for designing, executing, and reporting systems experiments for top-tier academic venues (like ICDE). It emphasizes methodological rigor, including mandatory ablation studies, reporting variance and tail latency (p99), demonstrating scaling trends (curves over points), disclosing cost trade-offs, and ensuring full hardware and software reproducibility to withstand adversarial review.