Skill UI

A rigorous, multi-phase auditing skill designed for blockchain protocols. It verifies whether the implemented smart contract code strictly adheres to the detailed specifications provided in whitepapers, design documents, or technical specifications. It performs exhaustive, line-by-line semantic analysis to identify gaps, inconsistencies, and deviations across logic, invariants, and security guarantees, making it essential for formal compliance checking in decentralized systems.

A comprehensive knowledge-base-first skill designed for deep literature reviews in advanced communication domains. Use it for topics like 4G/5G/6G, wireless networking, satellite communications, Wi-Fi, routing protocols, and cross-layer optimization. It systematically searches structured academic databases (IEEE, ACM, Zotero, etc.) to provide related work, survey papers, and landscape summaries.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting papers to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It details how to organize and present anonymous, reproducible code, data, and experimental artifacts to enhance the credibility and rigor of research in control, automation, and pattern recognition, supporting the double-blind review process.

This skill guides researchers to determine if their topic fits the scope of Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It provides detailed boundaries for control theory, pattern recognition, robotics, and smart systems, helping authors distinguish their contribution from pure algorithms or system software, and advising on appropriate article type (Review/Paper/Short) to avoid initial rejection.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting ACM MobiCom. It assists in conference fit assessment, manuscript re-framing, and strengthening the evidence base for mobile networking and wireless systems papers. Learn how to position your work against specific venue requirements, distinguish contributions (e.g., networking vs. platform), and structure your paper for optimal review impact.

A comprehensive guide for structuring high-impact scientific papers in advanced materials. It teaches authors how to build a cohesive narrative around a single central scientific advance, emphasizing the crucial causal chain: Structure → Property → Function. It also provides rules for optimizing the opening paragraph to serve as a self-contained abstract.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in electronics and signal processing preparing submissions to Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It outlines best practices for proactively structuring, documenting, and disclosing research artifacts—including code, datasets, and hardware designs—to maximize the paper's credibility and chances of acceptance, even without mandatory journal badges. Covers anonymization, reproducibility standards, and proper disclosure in the manuscript.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for ensuring scientific reproducibility in technical papers, particularly for electronics and information processing fields. It covers the critical pillars of documentation: environment setup, data sourcing and preprocessing, full algorithmic disclosure (including pseudo-code and hyperparameters), and robust statistical evaluation. By adopting these standards, authors can transform their work from potentially unverifiable results into credible, verifiable scientific contributions suitable for top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC). It helps assess the fit, scope, and required evidence for applied security papers, ensuring the manuscript is properly reframed from academic theory to deployable, operational defenses. Use this tool for venue selection and submission strategy.

This comprehensive audit guide helps authors prepare their research papers for the CAV submission portal. It covers crucial steps including selecting the correct paper category (Regular, Short Tool, etc.), adhering to LNCS formatting and page limits, and performing technical double-blind anonymity sweeps. Use this checklist to mitigate risks like identity leaks and filing errors before the final deadline.

This guide details the process of packaging and evaluating academic artifacts for ACM CCS conferences. It outlines the criteria for earning specific ACM badges (e.g., Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) by ensuring that supporting evidence—such as exploits, defenses, and measurement pipelines—is turnkey, reproducible, and rigorously documented for the review committee. It covers best practices for artifact planning, handling sensitive material, and justifying any withheld components.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.