Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides rigorous standards for advanced materials manuscripts. It mandates that structure–property claims must be validated through multiple, complementary characterization techniques (triangulation). It also details best practices for benchmarking against the state-of-the-art, ensuring reproducibility, and correctly partitioning core information between the main text and supplementary materials.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in electronics and signal processing preparing submissions to Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It outlines best practices for proactively structuring, documenting, and disclosing research artifacts—including code, datasets, and hardware designs—to maximize the paper's credibility and chances of acceptance, even without mandatory journal badges. Covers anonymization, reproducibility standards, and proper disclosure in the manuscript.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for ensuring scientific reproducibility in technical papers, particularly for electronics and information processing fields. It covers the critical pillars of documentation: environment setup, data sourcing and preprocessing, full algorithmic disclosure (including pseudo-code and hyperparameters), and robust statistical evaluation. By adopting these standards, authors can transform their work from potentially unverifiable results into credible, verifiable scientific contributions suitable for top-tier journals.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting networking research to CoNEXT. It outlines best practices for achieving technical reproducibility, focusing on pinning traces, configurations, environments, and pipelines. Learn the critical timeline for optional ACM badging and how to maintain an honest data-availability posture for robust academic review.

Provides guidelines for creating robust, verifiable, and reusable Electronic Design Automation (EDA) artifacts for submission to academic conferences like DAC. The focus shifts from chasing conference badges to ensuring community trust and scientific reproducibility. Key elements include pinning the toolchain, using standard benchmarks, providing clear setup instructions, and archiving the release in a DOI-issuing repository.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist for evaluating Electronic Design Automation (EDA) research manuscripts for top-tier conferences like DAC. It emphasizes the necessity of using standard, recognized benchmark suites (e.g., ISPD, EPFL, TAU), comparing results against the true State-of-the-Art (SOTA), reporting full PPA metrics and runtime, and implementing ablation studies to ensure fairness, reproducibility, and generalizability, especially for ML-based methods.

A comprehensive guide for establishing research reproducibility in Electronic Design Automation (EDA). It details best practices for pinning benchmark suites, disclosing specific tool versions (open/commercial), documenting technology nodes (PDKs), and handling stochastic data flows (seeds, variance). Essential for ensuring that semiconductor design claims and ML-for-EDA results are credible and verifiable by the academic community.

A comprehensive framework for ensuring rigorous scientific reproducibility in systems papers. It details how to establish a full provenance ledger (tracking hardware, software commits, and workloads), manage performance variance through repeated runs and statistical reporting, and implement automated pipelines so that all reported figures can be regenerated from raw data.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for achieving rigorous scientific reproducibility, especially for research involving storage systems and hardware dependencies. It mandates documenting not only the code but also the specific device models, firmware versions, operating states, and full measurement protocols to ensure verifiable results by peer readers.

A comprehensive guide for researchers preparing academic artifacts for voluntary, post-acceptance evaluation (e.g., HPCA). It outlines best practices for structuring submissions for cold-start evaluators, defining reproducibility tiers (full reproduction, regeneration from logs, inspection), and managing computational budgets to successfully earn IEEE reproducibility badges.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodology for ensuring that computational research results, especially those involving hardware architecture and simulation, are fully reproducible. It emphasizes pinning the entire result chain—from simulator commits and configuration files to workloads, sampling recipes, and statistics scripts—and mandates creating a manifest for every figure. Key practices include recording machine state for silicon runs and containerizing the environment to prevent data drift.