Skill UI

This tool guides authors on the rigorous standards required for submission to IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (TIE). It focuses on re-framing purely theoretical work into concrete, industrially relevant advances in control, power electronics, and mechatronics. It emphasizes the necessity of experimental validation, system-level industrial context, and adherence to specific journal guidelines.

This guide helps authors determine if their robotics research is suitable for IEEE Transactions on Robotics (T-RO). It focuses on establishing the necessary rigor, emphasizing that contributions must be complete and rigorously validated, preferably demonstrated on real robots or high-fidelity simulation platforms. It covers scope, experimental validation standards, and manuscript structure.

This skill guides researchers on preparing manuscripts for IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (TWC). It provides a detailed framework for assessing whether a paper has genuine wireless specificity, requiring quantitative analysis and simulation under realistic channel models (e.g., imperfect CSI, mobility). It covers core topics like MIMO, resource allocation, and advanced networking, ensuring the work meets the rigorous standards of top-tier academic publications.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for conducting rigorous networking evaluations, particularly for top-tier conferences. It mandates that every networking claim—be it optimality, performance improvement, or real-world behavior—must be matched with specific, verifiable evidence. This includes rigorous mathematical proof, seeded simulation results, or real-traffic testbed measurements. The guide emphasizes stating assumptions, using fair baselines, and ensuring statistical reproducibility across all studies.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting computer architecture papers to ISCA. It details the scope fit, required evidence (simulation or hardware), effective framing strategies, and provides comparisons with similar top-tier venues (like MICRO, HPCA). It helps authors refine their manuscript to meet the rigorous standards of a flagship conference.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing artifacts (code, data, models, etc.) for submission to the Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (JCAD&CG). It details best practices for ensuring research reproducibility, writing honest availability statements, and managing artifacts during the double-blind review process, focusing on ethical standards regardless of specific journal policy.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for conducting and presenting experimental evidence in high-level communication journals (JOC). It emphasizes moving beyond simple results to ensure statistical rigor, reproducibility, and comprehensive coverage of physical layer, network, and security aspects, helping submissions withstand expert peer review.

This tool guides authors in assessing whether their fluid mechanics manuscript is a suitable fit for the Journal of Fluid Mechanics (JFM). It emphasizes the need for fundamental physical understanding (e.g., new scaling laws, instability mechanisms) over mere demonstration of applied methods or devices. It covers rigorous standards for computation, experimentation, and theoretical analysis, serving as a crucial pre-submission framing and venue-selection resource.

This guide assists authors in determining if their manuscript on membranes and separation processes meets the rigorous standards of the Journal of Membrane Science. It emphasizes that the core contribution must be the mechanistic understanding—how the membrane structure governs transport and separation—rather than just reporting separation results. Use this skill for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and checking against high-level scientific rigor.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess if their electrochemistry manuscript (covering batteries, fuel cells, supercapacitors, etc.) is suitable for the Journal of Power Sources. It instructs users on how to reframe purely material-focused advances into compelling device-and-electrochemistry stories, emphasizing cell-level performance, degradation analysis, and rigorous testing standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting biomedical engineering research. It assesses the manuscript's fit, biomedical significance, and translational relevance against Nature's rigorous standards. Covers scope, validation requirements (benchtop vs. clinical), structural guidelines, and official submission checklists for devices, biomaterials, and engineered systems.

A comprehensive tool for authors submitting work on electronic devices, circuits, or systems to Nature Electronics. It guides the evaluation of the manuscript's broad scientific significance, technical rigor, and adherence to Nature's high stylistic and scientific standards, ensuring the work is field-advancing rather than merely incremental.