Skill UI

This guide details how to configure Grammarly API integration across multiple environments (Development, Staging, and Production). It ensures API credentials are isolated, style guides are managed per tier, and rate limits are respected. It provides setup instructions for mocking, sandbox testing, and robust deployment workflows.

This tool guides authors on whether their manuscript fits the scope of Advanced Functional Materials. It emphasizes the critical structure-function-application chain, covering highly advanced fields such as optoelectronics, biomedical devices, and soft robotics. It provides criteria for methodology, required evidence, and journal-specific house style.

This comprehensive skill provides in-depth guidance for authors targeting Advanced Materials. It covers journal positioning, scope fit (e.g., soft matter, 2D materials, energy), the required depth of evidence (methodology and characterization), and specific house style rules. Use this to re-frame your manuscript and ensure it meets the high standards for performance claims and scientific rigor expected by top-tier materials journals.

A comprehensive guide detailing the structural and rhetorical requirements for submitting networking systems papers to CoNEXT. It emphasizes leading with the problem context, tying every claim to real-world measurements, acknowledging limitations proactively, and adhering to strict academic formatting standards (acmart).

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising top-tier systems papers, specifically for conferences like EuroSys. It details the required academic structure, including building the problem-to-mechanism arc, managing the 12-page technical budget, writing rigorous evaluation sections (including measuring failure cases), and maintaining the necessary double-blind academic voice.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and improving the scientific rigor of hardware architectural evaluations (e.g., HPCA style). It emphasizes establishing a clear 'fidelity contract' defining tools, scope, and configurations. It requires that all performance claims are backed by credible instruments, mandates capturing full machine state provenance, ensuring honest baseline tuning, and reporting results via per-workload distributions rather than single means.

This guide provides rigorous structural and stylistic guidelines for writing top-tier academic papers in computer architecture (specifically for HPCA). It emphasizes building arguments around a single, measurable mechanism-to-behavior claim, quantifying the motivation with measured costs, ensuring all proposed mechanisms are checkable, and making sure every performance number is anchored to a specific instrument or simulation environment. It details the essential 'first-page arc' structure.

This guide provides a specialized framework for authors targeting the IACR Conference on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (CHES). It details the specific scope, evidence bar, and framing techniques required for cryptographic hardware papers, ensuring submissions meet the high standards of the community. It helps reposition work from journal or general CS styles.

A comprehensive style guide for structuring and refining robotics research manuscripts for top-tier conferences like ICRA. It dictates moving from technique-speak to task-first narratives, emphasizing figure-first presentation, rigorous quantification of claims, and adhering to strict page budgets to maximize reviewer impact and clarity.

This guide provides structured rules for authors writing sensor-systems or information-processing papers. It emphasizes leading with the physical sensing problem, requiring real-hardware measurements for energy, latency, and ground truth, and adhering to strict academic formatting constraints. Use this when revising submissions to ensure technical depth and practical deployability.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and revising high-level microarchitecture papers for top-tier conferences. It mandates the rigorous 'four-beat argument' structure: starting with characterization evidence, defining the insight, detailing the mechanism, and completing with thorough cost accounting. This ensures the paper is a defensible engineering argument.

This guide provides rigorous structural and disciplinary rules for authors submitting mobile-systems research to highly competitive conferences like MobiSys. It emphasizes moving beyond mere superlatives, mandating that all claims must be substantiated by explicit measurements of latency, energy, memory, and thermal budgets on real devices. Learn how to structure the paper to survive deep technical and systems-level peer review.