Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting high-impact materials research. It details how to select expert referees (covering synthesis, device, and application domains) and provides actionable strategies to pre-empt common reviewer objections—such as claims of incremental advance, insufficient characterization, or weak benchmarking—thereby strengthening the manuscript's overall rigor and maximizing publication success.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in electronics and signal processing preparing submissions to Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It outlines best practices for proactively structuring, documenting, and disclosing research artifacts—including code, datasets, and hardware designs—to maximize the paper's credibility and chances of acceptance, even without mandatory journal badges. Covers anonymization, reproducibility standards, and proper disclosure in the manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier electronics journals. It provides detailed methodologies on structuring experimental chapters, ensuring comparison fairness, achieving statistical rigor, and presenting reproducible results to withstand demanding peer review scrutiny.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC). It helps assess the fit, scope, and required evidence for applied security papers, ensuring the manuscript is properly reframed from academic theory to deployable, operational defenses. Use this tool for venue selection and submission strategy.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Biomaterials journal. It emphasizes the journal's core requirement: dual rigor. A successful submission must integrate thorough materials design and characterization with genuine biological evaluation (in vitro/in vivo), crucially establishing a mechanistic link between material properties and biological outcomes. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and pre-submission self-assessment against high academic standards.

This comprehensive audit guide helps authors prepare their research papers for the CAV submission portal. It covers crucial steps including selecting the correct paper category (Regular, Short Tool, etc.), adhering to LNCS formatting and page limits, and performing technical double-blind anonymity sweeps. Use this checklist to mitigate risks like identity leaks and filing errors before the final deadline.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting high-impact chemical engineering venues. It helps authors re-frame their work from simple material synthesis to demonstrating an applied advance with clear mechanistic insight. Focus areas include catalysis, separation, functional materials, and performance benchmarking under realistic process conditions.

This detailed guide helps authors assess the scientific rigor and scope fit for manuscripts targeting Composites Part B: Engineering. It covers advanced domains like composite mechanics, manufacturing processes, multiscale modeling, and multifunctional materials. It emphasizes that a strong contribution must demonstrate a clear, mechanism-driven advance from material science to structural application, supported by rigorous, quantitative experimental evidence and model validation.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic papers into optional ACM reproducibility badges. It walks authors through the rigorous evaluation cycle, covering everything from initial opt-in before submission to providing detailed one-page artifact descriptions. The goal is to prove that the research results are available, functionally sound, highly reusable, and accurately reproducible by independent evaluators.

Provides rigorous guidelines for conducting robust, verifiable, and reproducible evaluations in networking research. It emphasizes moving beyond simple simulations by demanding the use of real target platforms, documenting full system provenance (traces and configs), establishing honestly tuned baselines, and reporting detailed measurement statistics and uncertainty. Essential for authors aiming for top-tier conference submissions.

This comprehensive guide details the academic review pipeline for CoNEXT conference submissions. It covers double-anonymous double-blind review, the two-round TPC process, and the critical nature of the one-shot "major revision," which functions similarly to a journal's revise-and-resubmit cycle. It provides authors with strategic insights to structure their research for rigorous academic scrutiny.

This comprehensive audit guide assists researchers in preparing papers for CoNEXT submission. It covers critical workflow stages, including choosing the correct submission cycle (December or June), adhering to ACM acmart formatting and strict page budgets, managing the two-step registration process, ensuring double-anonymous review compliance, and implementing essential security checks to prevent identity leaks in artifacts and metadata.