Skill UI

This guide outlines the process of passive external reconnaissance using Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) techniques. Users can map an organization's digital footprint by gathering comprehensive data, including DNS records, subdomains, certificate transparency logs, social media profiles, and leaked credentials. It is critical for the planning phase of penetration testing, asset mapping, or preparing for social engineering, all without actively interacting with target systems.

This tool collects comprehensive diagnostic evidence for troubleshooting Miro REST API v2 integration problems. It gathers environment details, performs connectivity tests (DNS, HTTPS), checks rate limits, and aggregates recent application logs into a single, structured bundle. Use this when preparing a detailed support ticket or diagnosing persistent API issues.

A comprehensive simulation tool designed to pressure-test medical device manufacturers' Quality System Regulation (QSR) compliance against FDA standards (21 CFR 820). It covers six critical areas: complaint handling, process validation, device history records (DHRs), CAPAs, labeling, and handling of Form 483 observations. Essential for pre-inspection readiness, internal audits, and regulatory submission planning.

This skill provides a framework to organize and structurally review readiness evidence for major international standards, including ISO 13485 (Medical Devices), ISO 17025 (Testing Labs), and ISO 15189 (Medical Labs). It helps users define the scope, manage controlled documents, establish traceability, and compile preparatory material for substantive human expert review. It is explicitly a preparation tool, not an audit, certification, or legal determination system.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for artifact evaluation at major conferences (e.g., NSDI). It details how to package code, traces, and testbed recipes to ensure permanent public availability, achieve recognition badges (Functionality, Availability, Reproducibility), and meet community award criteria. Learn best practices for reproducibility and structured submission.

This guide outlines the best practices for preparing system artifacts for academic evaluation, following the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme. It details how authors must ensure reproducibility, especially for tail latency and cost results, by providing scaled-down testbeds, comprehensive documentation, and clear provenance tracking to satisfy conference evaluators.

This guide details the structured process for preparing and evaluating research artifacts for major academic conferences like SOSP. It covers badge targeting (Functional, Reusable), cooperative evaluation expectations, and best practices for packaging system-level artifacts, including defining tiers (runnable, provided-hardware, documented-only) and conducting 'kick-the-tires' smoke tests.