Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for positioning theoretical algorithms research in top-tier venues like SODA. It details how to conduct a rigorous "related work" review, covering bound lineages across conference proceedings, journal publications, and arXiv preprints. Learn best practices for citing dual-version results, managing priority claims, and writing scholarly prose to establish your result's state-of-the-art status.

This skill activates 'Steno Mode,' providing highly compressed, expert-level responses by eliminating filler words and superfluous tokens (up to 40% reduction). It maintains absolute technical precision, making it ideal for technical communications like code reviews, debugging Q&A, and architecture summaries. Users can select four defined levels (lite, brief, court, machine) to control the density, with exactness always taking top priority.

This guide clarifies the role of computation in theoretical computer science submissions, particularly for venues that prioritize theorems over empirical data. It distinguishes between legitimate forms of evidence—such as certified proof steps, constructive object discoveries, and illustrative examples—and inappropriate performance benchmarking. It helps researchers structure their work to align with theorem-based research, ensuring computational elements enhance the core theoretical contribution.

A comprehensive guide detailing the strategy, structure, and tactical writing needed for successful academic conference rebuttals (e.g., UIST). Learn how to manage character limits, prioritize factual corrections, promise concrete changes, and structure arguments to survive committee skimming, maximizing your chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for researchers handling academic revisions after receiving a journal decision letter (R&R). It teaches how to triage critical feedback from multiple referees, prioritize the editor's synthesis, structure detailed point-by-point responses using quantitative evidence, and sequence the revision work to maximize the chances of publication.

This tool provides a comprehensive, multi-faceted audit of a codebase's health. It scores the project across critical areas like security vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, dependency risks, and structural integrity. Ideal for senior engineers performing pre-commit or pre-release quality assessments to identify weak spots and generate a prioritized remediation plan.

This mode defines an autonomous, senior-level AI agent capable of resolving complex tasks from start to finish with minimal human supervision. It operates by strictly verifying every claim against real evidence (live web search, codebase, available tools). The agent prioritizes action over questioning, only interrupting the user for irreversible actions, genuine dead-ends, or critical ambiguities, ensuring maximum efficiency in hands-on engineering and operational workflows.

A comprehensive framework for authorized security assessments of Operational Technology (OT) and Industrial Control Systems (ICS). It emphasizes a 'passive-first' approach, covering Purdue model zoning, analyzing industrial protocols (Modbus, DNP3, etc.), and identifying exposure points on SCADA/DCS environments. The methodology strictly avoids disruptive write operations on PLCs, prioritizing read-only validation and safe network analysis for physical safety.

A comprehensive assistant designed to analyze existing codebases for adherence to SOLID principles, common code smells, and complexity metrics. It identifies anti-patterns like tight coupling, excessive responsibility, and duplication, providing prioritized, actionable refactoring suggestions to improve code maintainability and quality.

This tool simulates a senior application security engineer, performing a comprehensive, multi-phase audit. It checks for exposed secrets, prompt injection vectors, dependency vulnerabilities (supporting multiple languages), and critical configuration misconfigurations. It provides a scored, prioritized remediation report, ensuring a robust security posture before deployment.

This skill processes public Shopify App Store reviews (especially low-star ones) to generate a structured, actionable brief. It categorizes feedback into incident risk, repeated friction, pricing confusion, and feature requests, providing a prioritized P0-P3 assessment for product and support teams. It ensures every piece of feedback maintains its public source link and labeling for human review.

A strategic framework used in product management to shift focus from features to the core progress users are trying to achieve. It helps teams understand why users 'hire' a solution, map the forces driving change, and prioritize product development based on the true job needing completion, rather than just existing feature lists. Ideal for analyzing low adoption or defining new product strategy.