Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the process of responding to major or minor revisions from academic journals (like AAAG). It teaches authors how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, address editor and referee concerns methodically, strengthen the core academic argument, and incorporate required methodological and cartographic fixes, ensuring the response is both respectful and scientifically rigorous.

This guide teaches researchers how to rigorously assess a topic's geographic significance and determine its optimal fit within the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). It implements a two-part fit test—ensuring the argument is fundamentally geographic (space/place/scale are load-bearing) and possesses sufficient reach to interest neighboring subfields. It guides authors in choosing the correct area (e.g., Human, Physical, Methods) and appropriate journal venue (Annals vs. specialty). Use this when defining a project scope, overcoming reviewer critiques, or deciding wher...

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for writing the Related Work section for submissions to AAAI. It teaches authors how to robustly position their paper's novelty by distinguishing contributions from both established archival literature and contemporaneous non-archival work (like arXiv papers). It also addresses specific reviewer expectations across various AI subfields (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR) and outlines clear structural templates for maximum impact.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring supplementary material (technical appendices, code/data ZIPs, multimedia) for AAAI submissions. It emphasizes that core contributions and essential evidence must reside in the main paper, while appendices should only deepen the argument. It covers guidelines for maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring immutability, and achieving reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing high-quality AI research manuscripts intended for major academic conferences (e.g., AAAI). It teaches how to structure the first page for maximum impact, clearly state contributions (method, theory, system, etc.), ensure two-column readability, and address ethical limitations to appeal to a broad, non-specialist committee audience.

A comprehensive guide for revising complex multi-agent research papers for top-tier conferences. It emphasizes an 'interaction-first' approach, ensuring the unique contribution is highlighted on the first page. The guide mandates naming solution concepts, making the game legible, and rigorously pairing every major claim with a formal proof, self-play, or deployment experiment.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer reviewer feedback and revision comments for top-tier academic journals. It teaches structured rebuttal writing, handling disagreements while maintaining professionalism, and managing multi-round revisions to systematically increase publication probability.

A comprehensive guide on writing literature reviews and related work sections, specifically tailored for high-impact journals like Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It teaches authors how to frame their research by focusing on the incremental contribution (delta), moving beyond simple literature listing to establish clear gaps, contrasting current limitations, and rigorously defining the work's novelty in a structured manner.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for achieving scientific reproducibility in academic research, particularly for control systems, automation, and pattern recognition. It covers fixing environment dependencies, data handling, random seeds, and process pipelines, helping authors withstand rigorous peer review questioning and build verifiable research artifacts.

A comprehensive guide detailing the double-blind three-review process for academic journals. It breaks down the complete workflow—from initial submission and editor screening to external review, multiple revision rounds, and final acceptance. The guide provides authors with actionable advice on preparing for each stage, managing expectations, and avoiding common procedural pitfalls.

A comprehensive guide for NLP researchers on strategically positioning their work before writing. It teaches how to determine the core linguistic contribution, select the optimal academic venue (ACL, EMNLP, etc.), manage the scope (long vs. short papers), and align the research focus with specific conference themes and review expectations, maximizing publication impact.