Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for conducting rigorous academic literature reviews. It teaches authors how to critically appraise and synthesize conflicting empirical evidence by weighing findings based on credibility, study design, and contextual differences. The framework ensures balance, maintains objectivity, and elevates the quality of academic scholarship.

This guide provides detailed instructions on designing high-quality visual exhibits for academic literature reviews, such as the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc). It covers three primary exhibit types: 'Who-found-what' summary tables, conceptual framework figures, and meta-evidence plots. The focus is on synthesizing findings across multiple studies and structuring arguments, rather than presenting new primary estimates or raw data.

This guide details the rigorous double-blind peer review process used by major art history journals. It helps authors understand what expert referees and editors focus on—such as the originality of the argument, close visual analysis, and documentary evidence—to pre-empt common objections and significantly improve manuscript quality before submission. It emphasizes mastering academic standards and anonymity protocols.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complete academic review pipeline for IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering (ASE) submissions. It explains unique stages like the early-rejection gate, the criteria-bound revision process, and the difference between ASE's cycle and those of peer conferences (e.g., ICSE, FSE). Essential reading for authors aiming to submit high-quality research in automatic software engineering.

This guide outlines the rigorous, multi-stage workflow required to convert a conference acceptance or major revision into a final, publishable ACM-formatted paper. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring author details and citations), completing ACM rights forms, integrating archived artifacts, and managing the strict six-week timeline. Essential reading for authors ensuring their work meets high-quality publishing standards.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the developmental, multi-round review process at Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It explains decision types, reviewer roles, what to expect in each revision round, and how to strategically interpret complex decision letters to improve manuscript quality and submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous two-round, double-blind review process for submissions to the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It outlines the strategic importance of the extended abstract, the role of the shepherd, and how the process differs from other top-tier systems conferences like OSDI and SOSP. Essential reading for authors aiming to publish high-quality systems research.

This detailed guide outlines the structure and scientific rigor required for publishing high-quality papers in the domain of Computer Aided Verification (CAV). It instructs authors to transition their work from mere system demonstrations or benchmark reports to formally guaranteed, mathematically precise contributions, emphasizing clear scope definition, stated theorems, and proof ideas.

A comprehensive guide for authors planning research submissions to top-tier academic security conferences like CCS. It details the two-cycle HotCRP workflow, decision criteria, and strategic advice on addressing threat model soundness, novelty, evidence quality, and crucial ethical disclosure concerns across all stages, from initial review to minor revision.

A comprehensive guide for creating publication-quality scientific figures, adhering to high-impact journal standards. Covers critical topics such as optimal sizing for print widths, displaying underlying raw data (dot plots, replicates), ensuring colorblind accessibility, structuring stand-alone legends, and maintaining image integrity. Essential reading for researchers preparing manuscripts.

This comprehensive router guides users through the complete lifecycle of writing high-quality academic papers, specifically tailored to the standards of top financial and economic journals. It does not replace specialized skills but acts as a systematic workflow manager, helping users identify their current manuscript bottleneck and determining the optimal next step—from initial topic selection and literature review to advanced empirical identification and final rebuttal preparation.

This skill guide teaches how to polish complex academic prose for high-level journals, focusing on achieving an ambitious, lucid, and precise writing style. It emphasizes tightening style and discipline—ensuring clarity, maintaining a controlled academic voice, and adhering strictly to word limits (e.g., 9,500 words). It is designed to elevate the text's rhetorical quality without inventing new arguments or evidence.