Skill UI

This skill guides authors on how to precisely position a manuscript's contribution within a specialized academic field, particularly development economics. It teaches the structured process of identifying the specific literature gap, defining the binding open question, and clearly articulating the incremental advance. It is crucial for crafting compelling introductions and passing expert peer review at high-impact journals.

This guide helps researchers structure and articulate the unique contribution of their work, specifically tailored for high-impact journals like JEBO. It focuses on building the 'what we knew / what was missing / what this adds' framework, ensuring that the contribution is positioned at the mechanism level, whether the work is novel, a reconciliation, or a bounded replication.

A comprehensive guide for assembling a complete and reproducible materials package for experimental economics research, specifically for JEBO submissions. It details required components, including participant instructions, z-Tree/oTree code, anonymized raw data, detailed analysis scripts, and environment specifications, ensuring rigorous academic reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for academics writing in environmental economics, detailing how to articulate the marginal contribution of a manuscript. It teaches authors to move beyond simply presenting new data or methods, focusing instead on identifying the specific environmental-economic gap, policy parameter, or mechanism that the field currently lacks.

A comprehensive methodological guide detailing the robustness checks expected by environmental economics journals (e.g., JEEM). It provides a checklist of targeted statistical tests—including spatial inference, handling omitted variables, and varying market definitions—to ensure key welfare estimates are stable and not artifacts of specification choices. Essential for academic research in environmental and resource economics.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting empirical, quantitative, or theoretical growth papers. It details how to package data sources, code pipelines, calibration files, and historical/geospatial artifacts to meet stringent reproducibility standards for publishing journals.

This guide outlines a systematic methodology for gathering, reading, and synthesizing large bodies of academic research for comprehensive economic surveys (JEL style). It moves beyond simple summarization by enforcing structured data collection into a detailed evidence matrix. The process ensures maximum coverage through advanced search techniques (e.g., snowballing, JEL code sweeps) and focuses on synthesizing connections, identifying consensus, and articulating scholarly tensions across different studies.

This guide details the critical 'proposal-first' approach for submitting survey articles to the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL). It walks authors through crafting a compelling ~10-page sketch, covering the required structure, from defining the field and animating question to outlining the organizing framework and provisional conclusions. Learn how to maximize your chances of securing a commission from the journal editor.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors revising academic survey papers, particularly in economics (JEL). It details how to triage complex editor and referee feedback—including coverage gaps, balance complaints, structural weaknesses, and accessibility issues. It covers best practices for writing a detailed, point-by-point response letter and ensuring the scholarly integrity of the revised work.

This guide provides a structured methodology for translating highly technical academic papers, particularly in econometrics or macroeconomics, into plain language suitable for a broad scholarly audience (like the Journal of Economic Perspectives). It focuses on removing notation, jargon, and complex mathematical derivations, while rigorously preserving the underlying economic intuition and causal mechanism of the research.

This guide helps writers structure academic syntheses to maintain rigorous objectivity, ensuring that the work summarizes the full spectrum of competing views rather than advocating for a single position. It details how to properly 'steelman' opposing arguments, weigh evidence impartially, separate positive findings from normative policy judgment, and honestly disclose areas of uncertainty.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for drafting the abstract and introduction of highly theoretical papers, particularly in economics. It teaches authors how to lead with the main theorem, precisely articulate the theoretical advance, define the scope of the claim, and explain the significance relative to existing literature, ensuring zero overclaiming.