Skill UI

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

This guide provides expert knowledge on the history, etymology, and correct modern usage of the em dash (—). It covers various punctuation marks—including commas, semicolons, and colons—and offers specific guidelines on when to use them in professional writing, technical documentation, and code comments. It emphasizes adapting punctuation rules for different media types.

This comprehensive guide serves as a venue selection and content re-framing tool for research at the intersection of energy and environmental science. It details the high quantitative standards, required evidence (e.g., LCA, full-cell data, techno-economic analysis), and specific scope areas (solar, batteries, CO₂ capture) expected by Energy & Environmental Science (EES). Use this before submission to ensure your manuscript meets EES's broad, interdisciplinary impact criteria.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for authors submitting NLP and Computational Linguistics papers to EACL. It covers conference positioning, manuscript re-framing from journal or arXiv styles, and establishes rigorous evidence standards. It helps authors ensure their work aligns with the European ACL community focus, optimizing the paper's narrative structure for high acceptance rates.

A comprehensive guide for auditing and improving the scientific rigor of hardware architectural evaluations (e.g., HPCA style). It emphasizes establishing a clear 'fidelity contract' defining tools, scope, and configurations. It requires that all performance claims are backed by credible instruments, mandates capturing full machine state provenance, ensuring honest baseline tuning, and reporting results via per-workload distributions rather than single means.

This guide provides a strategic framework for authors responding to rigorous peer reviews in high-stakes academic venues. It details how to manage both short-term rebuttals and full revision submissions, covering objection triage (misreading, evidence gaps, adaptive attacks), precise scope definitions, and the formal documentation required for ethics and methodology. Learn to structure your response to maximize acceptance probability.

This guide provides rigorous standards for designing, validating, and reporting security research, particularly for high-stakes academic conferences like IEEE S&P. It covers critical areas including adaptive adversary modeling, measurement validity (sampling, ethics), statistical reporting, establishing strong baselines/ablations, and adhering to ethical constraints (IRB, authorization) to ensure evidence is robust and reproducible.

This package ensures full reproducibility for international macroeconomics research. It is designed for projects utilizing complex, multi-source, and often restricted data (such as IMF or central bank files). It mandates capturing the entire data lineage, pinning the execution environment (R, Python, Stata), and documenting access instructions, allowing any authorized replicator to rebuild the analysis from scratch.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP). It assists in positioning the manuscript, re-framing the contribution, and verifying the evidence bar. The tool emphasizes that the work must focus on knowledge acquisition, engineering, and operationalizing structured knowledge systems, rather than merely using them in a general context.

This guide provides best practices for creating high-impact tables and figures (exhibits) for academic journals, especially in behavioral economics. It emphasizes visualizing the core behavioral comparison—such as treatment effects, dynamic changes over rounds, or underlying distributions—so the main finding is immediately visible before reading any text. Key practices include using confidence intervals over significance stars, ensuring grayscale readability, and providing self-contained captions.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for presenting tables and figures in manuscripts submitted to The Journal of Finance (JF). It emphasizes the need for self-contained, accessible exhibits, ensuring that readers from any subfield can interpret the results solely from the caption and notes. Key standards include using economic units (bps, % of market cap), proper numbering schemes (Roman/Arabic), and separating decisive findings from exhaustive details in the Internet Appendix.

This skill adapts scholarly drafts to the specific, rigorous style of the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA). It enforces quantitative prose, strict formatting (e.g., 100-word abstract, TNR 12pt, double-spacing), and structural rules necessary for high-impact finance submissions. Use it to polish content, ensure precision, and guarantee compliance with top academic journal standards.