Skill UI

A comprehensive guide and checklist for preparing submissions for top-tier academic conferences, such as POPL. This resource helps researchers adhere to strict formatting rules (e.g., 25-page limits, acmsmall), maintain full double-blind anonymity, prevent unintentional author identity leaks, and manage the complex workflow and deadlines for academic publishing.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the entire academic publication review lifecycle, from initial submission to acceptance. It models the key stages—including editorial screening, expert review, revision, and final check—identifying critical decision criteria, common rejection reasons, and actionable leverage points for authors to significantly improve manuscript quality and navigate the publishing process.

A comprehensive style guide and checklist for writing and refining long-form academic articles for 'Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence' (PR&AI). It covers the entire publishing workflow, from mastering the structured introduction (Problem-Gap-Contribution) and writing four-element abstracts, to adhering to rigorous standards for citations (GB/T 7714), figures, and mathematical notation in AI research.

This guide details the mandatory open science requirements for modern academic publishing, particularly in psychological sciences. It covers essential practices such as depositing open data and materials with DOIs, drafting a Research Transparency Statement, linking preregistrations, and properly handling exemptions. It ensures manuscripts meet the high standards of reproducibility and transparency required by top-tier journals.

This comprehensive guide details the entire editorial review process for quantitative economics publications, covering stages from initial desk screening through to pre-acceptance reproducibility checks. It provides critical insights into expected timelines (4-5 months), desk-reject risks, the Econometrica transfer option, and mandatory data/code preparation requirements. It is designed to set clear professional expectations for authors throughout the academic publishing cycle.

Guides authors through the rigorous, end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a paper to the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It acts as an orchestration checklist, covering critical stages from initial scope definition and quantitative modeling to data archiving, manuscript formatting, fee payment, and handling revisions. It ensures authors maintain methodological rigor and code-first discipline throughout the entire academic publishing process.

Guides authors through the rigorous process of revising and responding to referee reports (R&R) for top-tier academic journals. It details how to structure the response letter, triage reviewer comments (concede, clarify, push back, decline), and ensures the revised manuscript precedes the letter. Essential for maintaining academic credibility during the publishing cycle.

A comprehensive guide for establishing credible causal inference in accounting and finance research. This methodology covers advanced techniques including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity (RDD), and experimental design. It instructs users on how to move beyond simple controls, defining the specific identifying variation necessary for publishing rigorous, causality-focused academic work.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to make systematic reviews and meta-analyses fully auditable and reproducible for academic publishing. It emphasizes adhering to standards like PRISMA and MARS, quantifying inter-coder reliability (e.g., Kappa/ICC), and sharing all open materials, including search strings, coding datasets, and analysis code (via OSF/DOI).

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning from summarizing individual studies to synthesizing knowledge across a field. It teaches the critical, integrative voice required for publishing high-impact reviews, covering structure (Introduction Arc), methodology (APA 7), and critical argumentation (Synthesis vs. Summary). Essential for systematic literature reviews.

This guide acts as a comprehensive workflow router for developing manuscripts intended for The Review of Financial Studies (RFS). It diagnoses the current stage of the research process—from initial topic selection and literature positioning to empirical design, robustness checking, writing polish, and rebuttal. It does not replace specialized skills but directs the user to the precise skill needed next, ensuring novelty and rigor are maintained throughout the entire academic publishing cycle.

This toolkit guides the entire academic publishing lifecycle, acting as a central router across multiple venues. It sequences critical steps—from selecting the ideal target journal (`rt-journal-match`) through data execution, submission readiness checks, simulated referee review, point-by-point rebuttal drafting, and generating the final replication package. It provides a structured, end-to-end process for researchers submitting complex manuscripts.