Skill UI

Provides a comprehensive guide for drafting academic abstracts for top-tier public administration journals, such as Chinese Public Administration (CPA). It enforces a strict four-part structure (Question $\rightarrow$ Theory $\rightarrow$ Findings $\rightarrow$ Contribution), ensures semantic alignment between Chinese and English versions, and guides authors on avoiding vague, empty phrases. Use this guide when revising manuscripts before submission to meet high journal standards.

A comprehensive, final-gate audit guide for submitting papers to major robotics conferences like ICRA using the PaperPlaza system. It details mandatory technical specifications, including page limits (6 content + 2 refs), IEEE two-column compliance, double-anonymous rules, video attachment specs, and critical deadlines. Essential reading to prevent submission rejection or administrative disqualification.

This comprehensive checklist guides academic authors through the final compliance checks for submitting a manuscript to the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS). It covers critical elements such as double-blind anonymization, adherence to APA-6 formatting, confirming manuscript category and length budgeting, and ensuring the inclusion of required components like SEM matrices, minimizing the risk of administrative rejection.

This guide provides a comprehensive, step-by-step preflight checklist for authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE). It covers critical rules such as strict page limits (≤35 pages), summary word counts (≤100 words, citation-free), data archiving requirements (ASCII/CSV), and proper formatting to prevent administrative rejection before peer review.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the rigorous submission process for the Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA). It ensures compliance with specific academic standards, including single-blind review format, mandatory data availability declarations (DCAS), handling of supplemental materials, and adherence to current membership and fee requirements. Use this guide before finalizing your submission to avoid administrative rejections.

A comprehensive framework designed to ensure environmental economics manuscripts meet rigorous data-availability and reproducibility standards, especially for journals like JEEM. This package guides users to document the entire research pipeline, handling complex issues like data versioning, proprietary satellite/admin data, and multi-step spatial operations by establishing a credible end-to-end reproduction path.

This guide walks authors through the entire academic publishing lifecycle for international marketing journals. It details the editorial pipeline, from initial administrative checks and editor screening to the detailed review process, including common desk-reject triggers (e.g., single-country data, lack of equivalence evidence). It also provides strategies for productive waiting, drafting anticipated objections, and managing revision decisions.

A comprehensive guide designed for authors targeting the Journal of Public Management. It helps authors assess the theoretical fit, methodological rigor, and structural requirements of their manuscripts. Use this tool to identify theoretical gaps, strengthen mechanisms, and adhere to top-tier Chinese academic journal standards in public administration and governance.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting policy evaluation manuscripts to academic journals. It outlines the rigorous standards required to ensure full research reproducibility, detailing the process of archiving data and code in public repositories, creating master scripts, and providing documentation for restricted administrative data access.

A comprehensive guide for conducting and reporting data analysis for submissions to the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It covers advanced statistical methods, addressing common-method bias, ensuring robustness, and meeting mandatory data and code release standards to withstand expert scholarly review.

A comprehensive guide to strengthening research designs for public administration manuscripts, particularly for rigorous journals that emphasize experimental and causal identification. It covers experimental designs, causal observational methods (DID, IV, RDD), multilevel modeling, and mixed methods, providing frameworks to defend against common methodological biases and rival explanations.

This guide details the rigorous academic evaluation process for manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It covers the critical steps of double-blind review, the initial desk screening for theory contribution and field fit, and the decision categories (reject, R&R, accept). It provides authors with a roadmap to pre-empt failure modes and significantly improve their submissions before they are sent to expert reviewers.