Skill UI

This comprehensive router guides researchers through the entire process of developing, analyzing, and submitting a manuscript to the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the next critical step—from initial topic selection and theory development to advanced econometrics, contribution framing, and final submission preparation. It ensures that the work maintains a rigorous, economics-based argument using archival data, preventing common pitfalls like vague ideas or insufficient identification strategies.

A comprehensive guide for analyzing and reporting findings in entrepreneurial research, specifically tailored for high-level academic journals. It covers advanced econometric techniques necessary to address common data challenges in venture panel data, such as survivorship bias, selection into founding, endogeneity, and attrition. It ensures methodological rigor and robust reporting.

This comprehensive guide assists users in analyzing and reporting data for high-impact academic journals, specifically following the rigorous standards of the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR). It covers advanced statistical process evidence (mediation, moderation, effect sizes) for behavioral experiments, as well as methods for establishing trustworthiness in interpretive (CCT) research. It emphasizes transparency, replication code, and adherence to modern research reporting mandates.

This guide provides advanced econometric methodologies crucial for establishing causality in financial and macro research, particularly when analyzing policy shocks (e.g., LPR changes, regulatory reforms). It details the correct application of Difference-in-Differences (DID), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and high-frequency analysis, ensuring robust empirical design for top-tier journals.

This guide helps researchers structure the institutional background section of advanced finance manuscripts. It emphasizes moving beyond general descriptions to precisely articulate regulatory rules, market segmentation, and ownership structures. The goal is to transform descriptive text into clear evidence for identifying exogeneity and analyzing policy shocks in empirical studies.

This specialized tool guides researchers in critically evaluating if an academic idea or dataset qualifies as a genuine, theory-contributing international-business phenomenon. It implements a rigorous multi-gate test, analyzing the phenomenon, level of analysis, international theory contribution, and cross-national variation needed for high-impact publishing in journals like JIBS.

A comprehensive framework for analyzing and presenting algorithmic contributions in academic papers. It guides users beyond mere computational speed, requiring rigorous proof of complexity (Big O), convergence (rate and conditions), or approximation bounds (rho). Essential for optimizing and validating complex computational models in scientific fields.

A specialized tool for researchers aiming to publish in the Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (JEBO). It helps authors assess the suitability of their behavioral, institutional, or organizational economics manuscript by analyzing the journal's scope, methodological bar, required evidence, and formatting standards. It serves as a pre-submission re-framing and checklist mechanism.

This guide targets the Journal of Physical Education, a CSSCI-level journal emphasizing school physical education, sport humanities, and social science. It is ideal for researchers studying PE reform, youth fitness, and sport policy. Submissions must demonstrate strong theoretical grounding and problem consciousness, analyzing educational, social, or health mechanisms rather than merely summarizing teaching experiences.

A comprehensive guide for analyzing multi-study packages for high-level academic journals. This skill focuses on executing internal meta-analyses, reporting standardized effect sizes with confidence intervals (CIs), establishing honest robustness checks, and reconciling confirmatory versus exploratory findings, meeting demanding journal standards.

This guide teaches rigorous conceptual analysis essential for analytic philosophy. It helps users define key terms precisely, draw clear distinctions between similar concepts, identify logical fallacies (like equivocation), and select the most appropriate philosophical method (e.g., conceptual analysis, thought experiments, formal modeling). Use it when an argument requires heightened precision and structural integrity.

This orchestrator guides writers through the entire process of developing academic philosophical articles. It acts as a sophisticated router, prioritizing the establishment of a sharp thesis and a sound argument before content polishing. By analyzing the submission stage and content type (e.g., Article, Book Review, Discussion), it maps out the optimal writing path, ensuring structural integrity and argumentative depth for academic publishing.