Skill UI

Drafts a LaTeX research paper section by section from an outline plan. Automatically applies venue-specific formats (ICLR, NeurIPS, CVPR, ACL, AAAI, ACM, IEEE), fetches real BibTeX records from DBLP/CrossRef to avoid hallucinated citations, enforces page-limit and anonymity conventions, and optionally profiles a reference paper for structural style. Use when moving from a paper plan to a complete LaTeX draft.

This end-to-end pipeline automates the conversion of a completed academic research paper into a full conference talk artifact. It generates a slide outline, Beamer source, editable PPTX, speaker notes, full script, and polished visuals. Critically, it includes rigorous assurance checks (citation, claim, anonymity) to ensure academic integrity, making the output suitable for top-tier conferences like NeurIPS or ICML. Use this when you need the complete, polished presentation package, not just a draft deck.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for authors submitting to the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (AAG). This guide ensures manuscripts meet the strict standards for double-anonymity, word count caps (e.g., 11,000 words), Chicago style formatting, and proper handling of sensitive geographic data before submission via ScholarOne.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with best practices for preparing supplementary artifacts for AAAI submissions. It outlines how to structure technical appendices, package reproducible code and data ZIPs, maintain strict anonymity (by removing author metadata and paths), and maximize the evidence for reproducibility. The goal is to ensure that external reviewers can easily verify the research claims without specialized or private tools.

Audit an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.

This guide provides detailed rules for structuring supplementary material (technical appendices, code/data ZIPs, multimedia) for AAAI submissions. It emphasizes that core contributions and essential evidence must reside in the main paper, while appendices should only deepen the argument. It covers guidelines for maintaining double-blind anonymity, ensuring immutability, and achieving reproducibility.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed audit checklist for authors submitting to the AAMAS conference. It covers verifying the correct conference track, maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to strict formatting rules (e.g., page limits, supplementary zip caps), and identifying potential submission-blocking risks to ensure readiness before the deadline.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed to guide authors through the rigorous preparation process for submitting academic manuscripts to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It covers critical steps such as adopting double-blind anonymity, mandatory author commitment forms, ensuring originality, and meeting the high formatting standards required for top-tier publications in control and automation theory.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

A comprehensive guide for drafting professional and strategic rebuttals for major academic conferences, such as ACM Multimedia. Learn how to triage reviewer comments, structure arguments for the Area Chair, address factual errors, and incorporate small, confirmatory results while maintaining anonymity and adhering to strict policy guardrails.

A comprehensive checklist for auditing academic submissions to ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). Covers thematic area selection, formatting constraints (6-8 page limit), enforcing double-blind anonymity, managing OpenReview mechanics, and identifying common desk-reject triggers. Essential for authors preparing technical papers for top-tier conferences.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing the supplementary material for multimedia conferences (e.g., ACM MM). It details how to structure the content, separating core arguments (Body) from supporting evidence (Supplement). Learn best practices for packaging videos, audio, and interactive demos, ensuring technical compatibility (H.264/MP4), maintaining anonymity for double-blind review, and creating a legible, reviewer-friendly submission index.