Skill UI

This guide provides critical advice on how to position scholarly articles, particularly in Comparative Politics and International Relations. It teaches authors to move beyond single-country case studies by framing their work within a live, cross-case academic debate. Learn how to identify theoretical gaps, engage with key literature, and articulate your unique contribution to the wider field.

This skill guides the creation of self-contained, highly accessible, and reproducible exhibits (tables, figures, maps) for World Politics manuscripts. It addresses strict length limits by differentiating between core arguments (in the article) and supplementary material (online appendix). It emphasizes visual communication excellence, moving beyond simple coefficient tables to forest plots and event studies to convey magnitude and uncertainty effectively.

This tool acts as the central orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitted to World Politics. It guides authors through the entire scholarly writing lifecycle, determining the correct article type (research vs. review), verifying the scope (must cross cases in comparative politics/IR), and routing the project to the appropriate specialized writing skills (e.g., theory building, data analysis, literature positioning). It ensures the work maintains a big, comparative, and international scope.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for constructing academically rigorous legal citations, adhering strictly to The Bluebook format and specific journal requirements. It emphasizes the necessity of pinpoint citations, ensuring every law or fact assertion is supported by an authoritative source. Essential for law students, legal scholars, and researchers drafting highly accurate scholarly articles.

This guide details the rigorous, unique evaluation process for academic articles and essays at Yale Law Journal (YLJ). Unlike traditional peer review, student editors conduct anonymous evaluations, focusing heavily on the originality of the claim, the completeness of the apparatus, and crucially, a thorough 'source-pull' where every citation must be rigorously verified and supported by the text. Use this to understand how to structure and prepare manuscripts for scholarly publication.

A comprehensive checklist for authors submitting to academic law journals, specifically tailored for The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides users through critical pre-upload steps, including mandatory anonymization checks, adhering to strict length caps (Article, Essay, Forum), verifying Bluebook citation apparatus, and ensuring the use of the official submission portal. This tool helps prevent common submission failures before the final upload.

This skill provides a rigorous fit test for legal scholarship ideas targeting The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It helps users determine if their claim has generalist significance beyond a single niche, whether the argument is substantial enough (a claim, not a survey), and what the appropriate format (Article, Essay, Forum) should be. It is crucial for pre-drafting evaluation.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for contributors to The Yale Law Journal (YLJ). It guides the user through the entire submission lifecycle, from initial topic selection and thesis development to Bluebook citation checking and final placement strategy. It emphasizes that submissions must be near-final, highly structured, and fully footnoted, directing the user to the appropriate skill path based on the article's track (Article, Note, Feature, etc.) and current stage.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors targeting Living Reviews in Relativity (LRR), a high-impact journal for authoritative, continuously updated review articles in relativity and gravitation. It covers the journal's unique 'living' model, required evidence standards, scope definition, house style, and the long-term commitment required to create a definitive, pedagogical survey article.

Implements GDPR-compliant pseudonymization for sensitive personal or clinical data from EU residents. Unlike full anonymization, this method creates a reversible mapping key, which must be stored separately and securely. This process allows for controlled re-linkage (e.g., for Subject Access Requests or longitudinal care) while maintaining GDPR Article 4(5) compliance by ensuring the linkage key is kept separate from the working data.

This orchestrator manages the entire end-to-end pipeline for preparing technical talks, transforming raw materials—whether code commits (REX mode) or conceptual articles—into polished revision sheets. It sequentially runs through multiple stages (Research, Concepts, Scripting, Revision) with human-in-the-loop checkpoints, ensuring a structured and comprehensive content creation workflow.

This skill transforms diverse raw source materials—such as articles, transcripts, and notes—into a highly structured summary suitable for a presentation or talk. It automatically detects the source type (Real-world Evidence or Conceptual Thesis), extracts the narrative arc, identifies key metrics, outlines main themes, and critically highlights potential gaps, providing a complete foundation for content creation.