Skill UI

A comprehensive checklist for authors preparing an accepted IEEE VIS paper for the final camera-ready journal submission (IEEE TVCG). It guides authors through critical steps including de-anonymizing the work, applying the correct journal template, completing comprehensive metadata (ORCID, DOI), integrating required revisions, and ensuring all open materials are permanently linked to public archival DOIs.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier visualization venues (like IEEE VIS/TVCG). It teaches authors how to write the 'Related Work' section by adopting a 'delta-first' contrast approach, demonstrating novelty by clearly positioning the new work against prior art across multiple adjacent domains, including HCI, Graphics, and other regional visualization venues.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous, journal-style review process for IEEE VIS full-paper submissions. It explains the two-phase evaluation structure, the significance of a 'Conditional Accept' (treating it like a major R&R), and how the process differs fundamentally from single-decision conference models (e.g., CVPR, CHI). Essential reading for authors navigating academic publication.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting full papers to IEEE VIS. It covers the complex, multi-stage submission process, requiring authors to adhere to journal-quality standards (IEEE TVCG). The guide details the strict deadlines for abstracts, full papers, and supplemental materials, along with critical mechanics like the 9+2 page budget, proper society/track selection, and advanced double-blind anonymization techniques.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting visualization papers to major conferences like IEEE VIS. It outlines the strict rules for partitioning content, ensuring the core argument remains judgeable from the main body while leveraging supplemental materials (video, code, full data) to demonstrate interaction and reproducibility. Essential reading for academic researchers in the field.

This guide outlines the rigorous process for authors responding to a "revise" verdict at top-tier academic conferences. It teaches authors how to treat reviewer feedback as a formal contract, manage a tight revision timeline, structure necessary experiments, and write a highly traceable change document that explicitly addresses every required point.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous, multi-step process required for authors to finalize and submit their accepted papers for VLDB proceedings. It covers essential technical compliance points, including using the correct volume template, ensuring PDF/A compliance with embedded fonts, adhering to figure legibility rules, and detailing the permanent storage of research artifacts (DOI-backed). It also outlines the associated conference presentation obligations.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous standards required for achieving experimental reproducibility in systems research papers (e.g., VLDB). It instructs authors on disclosing critical context, including hardware specifications, software configurations, data provenance, workload patterns, and handling measurement variance. Adhering to these guidelines ensures that all performance claims are fully traceable from raw data to published figures, meeting the highest standards of academic review.

This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the VLDB submission and review pipeline. It details the rolling monthly structure, the decision outcomes (Accept, Revise, Reject), and the specific expectations for authors at each stage. Use this to set realistic expectations regarding review timelines, the nature of expert feedback, and optimizing your revision strategy, contrasting it with traditional batch venues.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors submitting research papers to PVLDB (Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment). This resource details critical steps, including adherence to multiple deadlines (abstract, full paper), category budget selection, single-blind formatting rules, and author co-contribution caps, ensuring submissions avoid desk rejection.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.

This comprehensive guide manages the entire project lifecycle for academic conference submissions, such as VLDB. It provides detailed methodologies for initial volume planning, computing optimal submission timelines (month-picking), coordinating group author contributions, and managing the revision bandwidth. It is essential for maintaining rigorous scheduling and mitigating the risk of missed deadlines in fast-paced research environments.