Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides the optimal structure and academic writing discipline for submitting high-quality technical papers to major computer graphics conferences, such as SIGGRAPH. It emphasizes building a compelling 'first-page arc,' leveraging the teaser figure to immediately demonstrate results, maintaining academic honesty by detailing limitations, and adhering to strict page budget constraints.

This guide details the critical 'triage protocol' for structuring academic papers for highly constrained venues like SIGIR. It outlines the three-container model (Paper Body, References, Repository) and provides expert advice on prioritizing review-critical evidence, implementing effective content compression techniques, and managing external repository material to ensure submissions meet strict page budgets without sacrificing soundness or review quality. Essential reading for researchers.

Provides detailed strategies for authors responding to peer reviews in top-tier academic conferences like SIGMOD. It covers the distinct rules for the mid-round feedback phase and the formal revision letter, emphasizing structured responses, mandatory change highlighting, maintaining anonymity, and strategic content budgeting.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting technical papers to top-tier conferences, detailing how to effectively partition content between the main paper body and supplementary artifacts. It emphasizes the critical rule that all decision-making evidence (e.g., headline results, key performance metrics) must reside within the limited page budget of the main submission, ensuring the work is judgeable even without accessing raw data.

This comprehensive guide details the specific structural and stylistic requirements for submitting high-quality theoretical computer science papers to top-tier conferences like STOC. It addresses how to frame the initial theorem statement, structure the technical overview, maintain notation economy, and effectively budget the limited page space to ensure maximum academic rigor and readability for diverse expert audiences.

Track physical units and propagate measurement uncertainty in scientific Python calculations using pint and uncertainties, from unit conversion and GUM budgets to Monte Carlo and dimensional sanity checks.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting full papers to IEEE VIS. It covers the complex, multi-stage submission process, requiring authors to adhere to journal-quality standards (IEEE TVCG). The guide details the strict deadlines for abstracts, full papers, and supplemental materials, along with critical mechanics like the 9+2 page budget, proper society/track selection, and advanced double-blind anonymization techniques.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors submitting research papers to PVLDB (Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment). This resource details critical steps, including adherence to multiple deadlines (abstract, full paper), category budget selection, single-blind formatting rules, and author co-contribution caps, ensuring submissions avoid desk rejection.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to academic conferences, addressing strict page limitations where appendices count against the core budget. It details best practices for distributing supplementary evidence across three external homes: the main paper, dedicated arXiv technical reports, and artifact repositories. The guide emphasizes maintaining self-containment, managing version discipline, and strategically cutting content to ensure the core claims are reviewable.

A comprehensive guide to structuring and writing academic papers for WACV, focusing on maximizing acceptance rates. It details the critical differences between writing for 'Applications' vs. 'Algorithms' tracks, ensuring the first page immediately captures reviewer attention. Key advice includes adhering to the strict 8-page budget, making figures self-contained, scoping all claims precisely, and moving excessive detail to supplements.

A comprehensive guide for authors on allocating limited space within academic conference papers. It details the 'three-container model' (main body, references, appendix) and provides rules for maximizing rhetorical impact while adhering to strict page limits, ensuring evidence is placed correctly for reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for auditing research papers submitted to the WSDM conference. It details critical constraints, including the no-rebuttal policy, strict 9-page budgets (including appendices), and stringent hybrid anonymization requirements. Use this guide to preemptively identify and correct submission flaws before the deadline.