Skill UI

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the rigorous review process at International Organizations (IO). It covers aspects like double-blind peer review, specialized expert assessment, and the distinctive verification stage where quantitative results and formal proofs are re-run. Use this to pre-empt potential failure modes and structure your manuscript for maximum impact before submission.

A comprehensive guide for the final pre-submission quality check of academic manuscripts, particularly for double-blind review processes. It covers critical compliance points such as maintaining anonymity, adhering to strict word counts (including figures/tables), managing separate metadata (abstracts, acknowledgments), and ensuring proper third-person self-citation to avoid common rejection pitfalls.

A guide for designing and structuring empirical tables and figures for submissions to International Organizations (IOs). Focuses on meeting strict word limits, ensuring exhibits are self-contained, reproducible, and clearly separating core arguments (main text) from supporting details (supplementary material). Best practices include explicit unit labeling, prioritizing effect plots over dense tables, and guaranteeing that all displayed numbers match the original analysis code.

This guide assists in elevating isolated findings into generalizable theories of international politics. It provides a structured framework for building arguments—whether empirical, formal, or constructivist—by explicitly defining core international mechanisms, scope conditions, and testable observable implications, ensuring the theory's portability across different global cases and institutions.

This guide outlines the mandatory data and code requirements for publishing manuscripts in International Organizations (IOs). It details the rigorous process—from conditional acceptance to final publication—which requires authors to prepare complete, reproducible packages. Key steps include submitting data/code, undergoing external re-running of quantitative results, verifying formal model proofs, and depositing materials with a DOI in the IO Dataverse.

A comprehensive guide for polishing and structuring International Relations manuscripts for submission to major International Organizations (IO) journals. It ensures the paper meets rigorous academic standards: framing a generalizable theoretical contribution, adhering to strict word caps (e.g., 14,000 words), and following double-blind formatting conventions (like third-person citation and separate abstract/word count).

Provides a comprehensive guide for packaging complex research artifacts, integrating hardware, firmware, and datasets. It outlines best practices for achieving academic badges (e.g., Available, Functional, Reusable) and winning the Best Research Artifact Award. Learn how to structure analysis paths, manage raw traces, and ensure reproducibility across different evaluation environments.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for final publication. It details the requirements for a dual-publisher format (ACM and IEEE), covering mandatory steps like de-anonymization, completing dual metadata (ORCID, CCS, DOI), integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep, and permanentizing dataset/firmware links using public DOI archives. This ensures the submission meets the highest standards for academic rigor and publishing platforms.

A comprehensive guide for designing and auditing rigorous experiments for sensing systems and information processing claims. It emphasizes the necessity of measuring performance on real hardware (not simulation), accurately instrumenting ground truth, quantifying energy consumption, latency, and physical footprint, and establishing fair, skeptical baselines. This ensures scientific rigor and reproducibility in research submissions.

A comprehensive guideline for establishing and documenting the reproducibility of complex sensor-systems artifacts. It covers necessary components such as firmware sources, detailed hardware Bills of Materials (BOMs) and board files, raw sensor traces, ground truth data, and calibrated measurements. Use this guide to ensure that scientific claims can be verified by a competent reader, detailing the exact dependencies on physical equipment and software toolchains.

This guide models the rigorous, double-blind, and per-track evaluation process for submissions to the IPSN conference. It details how papers are judged based on the soundness of information-processing methods, the reality of collected evidence (e.g., measured energy, latency), and the novelty of sensing approaches. It also clarifies key differences from other academic venues like SenSys and OpenReview, guiding authors on what evidence is crucial for acceptance.

Provides strict guidelines for structuring technical research papers, especially in sensing systems. It dictates how to partition core claims, methods, and decision-critical evidence between the main body (the reviewed pages, limited to ≤12 pages) and supplementary artifacts, appendices, or demos. The core rule is that the paper must be judged solely from the reviewed pages, ensuring all necessary evidence is visible to the reviewer.