Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for final publication. It details the requirements for a dual-publisher format (ACM and IEEE), covering mandatory steps like de-anonymization, completing dual metadata (ORCID, CCS, DOI), integrating reviewer feedback without scope creep, and permanentizing dataset/firmware links using public DOI archives. This ensures the submission meets the highest standards for academic rigor and publishing platforms.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for responding to academic conference reviews, particularly those with no formal rebuttal period (like IROS). It details the three key channels of response: pre-submission objection handling, integrating meta-review feedback into the camera-ready manuscript, and drafting formal response letters or resubmission memos. It emphasizes maintaining scope, transparency, and evidence integrity throughout the process.

This comprehensive guide provides a step-by-step checklist for authors transitioning from an anonymous conference submission to a final, polished, camera-ready manuscript. It covers de-anonymization (restoring author details), integrating meta-review critiques, ensuring compliance with major publishers (like IEEE eCF/PDF-eXpress), and preparing supporting public artifacts, making it essential for academic publication success.

Use this skill to manage the end-to-end timeline for an IROS paper submission. It provides a comprehensive backward-planning workflow covering milestones like evidence lock, paper deadlines, video attachments, and camera-ready preparation, ensuring the project stays on track for the fall IEEE/RSJ conference.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous, multi-step process of converting an accepted, anonymized conference paper into its final, published 'camera-ready' format. It covers technical requirements such as de-anonymizing author details, restoring artifact links, updating metadata, managing publisher-specific workflows (ACM/IEEE), and preparing for conference talks and publicity.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

This guide outlines the critical steps required after an academic paper has been accepted at a major conference. It details the process of converting an anonymous submission into the final, camera-ready version for publication in the ACM Digital Library. Key steps include de-anonymization (restoring author details, affiliations, and funding), completing ACM rights forms and metadata (ORCIDs, CCS), verifying the final layout integrity after template changes, and confirming presentation obligations.

This comprehensive guide addresses the unique challenges of submitting research to top-tier conferences that do not include formal author-response or major revision rounds. It teaches authors a proactive strategy: how to pre-empt potential reviewer objections (e.g., novelty, scope limitations) by embedding necessary arguments, proofs, and context directly into the initial submission. Furthermore, it provides actionable plans for navigating both acceptance (camera-ready fixes) and rejection (diagnosis and strategic rerouting) without relying on traditional appeal processes.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of transforming a submitted ITCS paper into the final, open-access LIPIcs camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including switching to the required `lipics-v2021` LaTeX class, fully re-attributing author identity (names, ORCIDs, funding), completing structured metadata (ACM CCS, keywords), incorporating reviewer-suggested fixes, and ensuring compliance with strict production standards set by the Dagstuhl editorial office.

This comprehensive guide assists authors in navigating the critical steps after manuscript acceptance in academic journals, particularly in CAD and Graphics. It covers de-anonymization (adding acknowledgments, funding, and real links), meticulous formatting checks, ensuring high print quality (resolution, color fidelity), rigorous proofreading protocols, and managing copyright requirements to ensure a smooth transition to final publication.

A comprehensive workflow guide mapping the entire academic submission lifecycle for JCAD&CG, from initial topic selection to final camera-ready stage. It organizes 12 key stages, identifying critical deliverables, decision points, and necessary steps at every phase to ensure a smooth and systematic publication process.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the critical 'camera-ready' phase for academic publishing, specifically for JCRD. It ensures that all metadata, including author identities, institutional details, funding grants, and permanent links, are restored and verified. The guide covers adherence to formatting standards (e.g., GB/T 7714), precise revision limits during proofreading, and systematic de-anonymization to prevent publication errors.