Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting a strategic response during the OpenReview cycle. This resource covers how to address reviewer objections, shape the Area Chair's meta-review summary, manage the discussion phase, and decide whether to defend the paper or withdraw for a future revision cycle. Focus on clarity, conciseness, and evidence-based arguments.

A comprehensive guide for formatting research exhibits, including Impulse Response Functions (IRFs), fan charts, and econometric tables, specifically for submissions to the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). This ensures all figures are self-contained, meet rigorous standards for clarity, and adhere to the latest macro conventions, allowing reviewers to quickly assess the quantitative evidence.

This guide outlines best practices for authors presenting theoretical and empirical results for top-tier journals like the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro). It covers structuring propositions, building transparent numerical examples, creating schematic figures, and formatting tables (including mandated use of standard errors over significance asterisks) to ensure maximum clarity and adherence to academic publishing standards.

This guide details best practices for transforming raw econometric outputs (coefficients, significance stars) into self-contained, policy-message-carrying exhibits for top-tier economic journals (e.g., AEJ: Policy). It emphasizes replacing significance stars with standard errors (SEs) or confidence intervals (CIs), creating a 'headline exhibit' that communicates the policy effect in interpretable units, and structuring tables and figures for maximum clarity for non-academic policymakers.

This guide provides rigorous methodological guidelines for ensuring the identification strategy in high-impact empirical economics papers (AER: Insights). It covers key areas including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), Instrumental Variables (IV), and structural parameter identification. It emphasizes the need for extreme methodological clarity, transparency, and conciseness required for top-tier academic publication.

A comprehensive style guide for polishing and refining academic manuscripts intended for the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ). It ensures strict adherence to APA 7th edition standards, improves clarity for a broad academic audience, and guides authors on structuring the contribution, managing abstract length (100-120 words), and meeting strict page limits.

This skill is designed to polish and refine academic manuscripts intended for the American Historical Review (AHR). It focuses on enhancing the clarity, narrative flow, and authoritative voice of the prose, ensuring the work is accessible and engaging for historians across all subfields. It tightens the overall readability, minimizes unnecessary jargon, and helps frame evidence without altering the core arguments or academic content.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to the American Journal of Sociology (AJS). It outlines best practices for data documentation, ensuring research provenance, and ethically sharing findings in both quantitative and ethnographic contexts. It emphasizes creating a thorough, checkable evidentiary trail appropriate to the claim, while clarifying AJS's non-mandatory policy on replication deposits and adherence to confidentiality standards.

This tool provides comprehensive, late-stage polish for full-manuscript academic prose, specifically tailored for top-tier journals (e.g., AMJ). It focuses on transforming dense, jargon-heavy text into rigorous yet highly readable narratives. Key functions include front-loading the core argument, enforcing active voice, refining structural flow (Introduction to Discussion arc), ensuring consistent terminology, and adhering strictly to required academic house styles and formatting standards. It improves clarity and rhetorical impact without altering the theoretical contribution or data analy...

A comprehensive guide for constructing conceptual exhibits—such as process models, 2x2 typologies, and multi-level frameworks—for academic manuscripts. This resource emphasizes that figures must represent pure theoretical work (constructs and relationships) rather than empirical data plots, ensuring structural clarity for top-tier academic publishing.

A comprehensive guide for structuring pure mathematics manuscripts, focusing on exposition, logical flow, and readability for expert non-specialists. It emphasizes stating theorems before proof, maintaining consistent notation, and using commutative diagrams or figures only when they clarify complex relationships better than prose.

A comprehensive strategy guide for mathematical authors to stress-test their proofs before submission. It outlines how expert academic referees rigorously review work, advising on strengthening weak steps, verifying external theorems, clarifying the core argument, and handling boundary cases to significantly improve the manuscript's rigor and chances of acceptance.