Skill UI

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether their finance manuscript is suitable for top-tier academic journals like the Journal of Banking & Finance (JBF). It provides a detailed framework to check for institutional content, rigorous empirical design, external relevance, and the potential to significantly change prior assumptions, while also offering routing advice to alternative specialized venues.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing manuscripts for the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV). It does not write the content but guides the user through the necessary sequence of specialized skills—from initial topic selection and theory development, through data analysis, writing style refinement, to final submission and rebuttal planning. Use this when you need a structured plan for tackling a complex academic paper.

A comprehensive pre-submission audit guide for authors targeting the 'Journal of Computer Research and Development' (JCRD). This guide ensures manuscripts comply with the journal's rigorous standards, including double-blind review anonymity, specific Chinese formatting (GB/T 7714), structured content components, and academic integrity requirements.

A comprehensive guide for assembling the required data and code replication package for manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA). This package ensures compliance with the DCAS standard, enabling the journal's Data Editor to verify the reproducibility of empirical, simulation, or experimental results before formal acceptance. It outlines the mandatory structure, README contents, and execution steps.

This guide details the specific formatting and content rules for creating an "Internet Appendix" when submitting academic manuscripts to The Journal of Finance (JF). It advises authors on separating extensive proofs, robustness checks, and detailed data construction from the main text to ensure the core paper remains self-contained and adheres to strict page limits, while still providing necessary depth for reviewers.

This skill adapts scholarly drafts to the specific, rigorous style of the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA). It enforces quantitative prose, strict formatting (e.g., 100-word abstract, TNR 12pt, double-spacing), and structural rules necessary for high-impact finance submissions. Use it to polish content, ensure precision, and guarantee compliance with top academic journal standards.

This guide provides detailed structural and stylistic rules for polishing academic manuscripts intended for high-impact journals, such as the Journal of Human Resources (JHR). It instructs authors on structuring the abstract, writing results paragraphs, translating coefficients into policy-relevant units, and compressing long-form content to adhere to strict page limits, ensuring the core policy lesson is immediately visible.

This comprehensive pre-submission checklist is designed for authors preparing academic manuscripts for specific journals. It guides users through critical checks, including length constraints (e.g., $\le 8000$ chars), abstract/keyword requirements, proper citation styles (sequential numbering), and highly specific formatting for mathematical content (formula numbering, theorem placement). Use this tool to ensure your paper meets all structural and stylistic guidelines before submission.

This skill guides the process of drafting and polishing academic manuscripts, particularly for journals adhering to the APA 7th edition style. It focuses on ensuring the theoretical contribution is clear, maintaining a structured narrative arc (Introduction, Theory, Method, Results, Discussion), and achieving high levels of rigor. It polishes prose, tightens structure, and ensures statistical reporting includes effect sizes and confidence intervals, without inventing content.

This guide provides a structured framework for revising a manuscript after a 'revise-and-resubmit' (R&R), particularly for multi-paradigm fields like communication studies. It focuses on strategic academic writing: mapping conflicting reviewer demands (e.g., post-positivist vs. critical), managing the strict page budget (e.g., 35-page limit), and structuring the response memo to the editor-in-chief. It emphasizes framing the response as a principled trade-off rather than simply adding content.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in strengthening the methodological rigor of communication studies manuscripts. It details best practices for experimental design, surveys, content analysis, and computational pipelines, helping authors preemptively address common reviewer critiques regarding causality, sample validity, and internal/external validity.

This skill serves as the central orchestrator for submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Communication (JoC). It does not write content but guides the user through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial idea generation and literature positioning to final submission and rebuttal. It determines the appropriate content format (e.g., original article, Forum post) and routes the user to the specific, necessary sub-skills required at that stage, ensuring a structured and comprehensive academic workflow.