Skill UI

This guide provides expert advice on positioning research papers for top-tier computer architecture conferences (e.g., ISCA, MICRO, ASPLOS). It teaches authors how to identify the 'center-of-gravity' of their novelty—whether it lies in the hardware organization, the hardware/software contract, or the software layer alone—to maximize review acceptance chances and successfully navigate the competitive academic publication landscape.

A comprehensive guide for authors revising technical papers for top-tier conferences like ISSTA. It details the necessary structure, emphasizing strict scope definition, establishing clear evaluation contracts (subjects, baselines, metrics), pairing every claim with concrete evidence, and adhering to specialized review discipline.

A comprehensive guide for structuring academic manuscripts intended for top-tier journals like JAE. It teaches authors how to transition from merely identifying a research gap to joining and advancing an ongoing, seminal, economics-based scholarly conversation. Key focus areas include capital markets, financial contracting, and disclosure theory.

This guide outlines the rigorous method for developing econometrically testable hypotheses for accounting research, particularly for high-tier journals. Instead of relying on vague constructs, it teaches how to ground predictions in core economic theories like information economics, agency theory, and contracting frictions. It helps researchers build a clear mechanism by specifying the agent's optimization problem, identifying the core friction, and deriving conditional, testable predictions.

This guide details the unique, editor-driven submission process for the Journal of Economic Perspectives (JEP). It advises authors on managing scope, length, and framing when working with an editorial team, rather than anonymous referees. Key strategies include treating the proposal as a contract, prioritizing accessibility for a broad audience, and negotiating scope early in the process.

This guide details how to assemble a comprehensive, reproducible replication package for academic manuscripts, especially in fields relying on complex institutional data (e.g., court records, contracts). It mandates creating a one-command master script, documenting the entire data pipeline from raw sources to final exhibits, and providing detailed protocols for hand-coded variables and data provenance. The goal is to ensure that any researcher can perfectly reproduce every finding.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for authors to assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO). It guides the intersectional contribution, covering positive political theory, contract economics, and organizational economics. The tool details required methodologies (e.g., credible identification, robust modeling), structural requirements, and common pitfalls to ensure the paper delivers a genuine law-economics-organization contribution.

This guide outlines the stringent standards for ensuring the reproducibility of Natural Language Processing (NLP) research. It teaches authors how to treat the Responsible NLP checklist as a binding contract by meticulously 'pinning' every variable—including model identifiers, API access dates, prompt strings, random seeds, and evaluation metrics. It details creating a comprehensive reproducibility manifest to make research results verifiable and defensible.

Create fillable Word documents (.docx) with content controls, legacy form fields, mail-merge placeholders, and document protection using OfficeCLI. Ideal for onboarding forms, surveys, contracts, and templates where only specific fields are editable.

This guide provides guidelines for ensuring that academic proofs are independently verifiable, particularly for proofs-focused conferences. It covers creating self-contained proof appendices, meticulously defining all underlying assumptions in a 'model box' contract, and ensuring perfect synchronization between the short conference proceedings and the full arXiv version.

Provides a structured methodology for authors preparing a technical resubmission response, particularly for systems-level research. It emphasizes treating reviewer feedback as a contractual list of required changes, necessitating new measurements and concrete evidence rather than mere arguments. Users learn to create a critical 'change-map,' prioritize blocking concerns, and maintain professional anonymity during the resubmission process.

This comprehensive guide outlines the structured process for authors responding to peer review feedback for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., SIGCOMM). It critically distinguishes between drafting a concise, decision-focused rebuttal and executing a formal, contract-bound one-shot revision. It provides strict guidelines on building the required submission packet, including point-by-point responses, change-marked manuscripts, and evidence anchoring, ensuring submissions meet high academic standards.