Skill UI

A comprehensive workflow for systematically reviewing medical evidence. It allows users to search databases for clinical studies, build curated citation collections, grade evidence using established frameworks like GRADE, and generate professionally formatted, structured reports in academic citation styles (e.g., AMA). Ideal for conducting literature reviews and supporting clinical research. This tool helps transform raw medical data into actionable, structured knowledge.

This comprehensive guide defines the secure data lifecycle management for OpenEvidence, an AI-powered platform for clinical evidence synthesis. It outlines data classification (e.g., clinical queries, patient responses), strict adherence to global regulations (HIPAA, GDPR, FDA), and technical requirements for handling Protected Health Information (PHI). Key processes include PHI de-identification, data validation, secure API integration, and compliant data export, ensuring the system maintains the highest level of patient privacy and regulatory compliance.

This guide demonstrates how to implement robust rate limiting and retry logic for critical healthcare APIs using a token bucket pattern. It covers managing specific service limits (e.g., clinical queries, evidence synthesis) and implementing strategies like exponential backoff and batch processing to ensure graceful degradation and reliable data retrieval in clinical decision support systems.

BGPT Paper Search queries the remote MCP server to retrieve structured experimental data from full-text studies, returning methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions for efficient literature reviews and evidence synthesis.

TorchDrug is a PyTorch-native toolbox for building graph neural networks tailored to molecules, proteins, and biomedical knowledge graphs, covering property prediction, generation, retrosynthesis, and knowledge graph reasoning with curated datasets and models.

Generates consulting-grade research reports in markdown, guiding users through framework creation and final synthesis across market, finance, brand, and industry domains with strict data traceability.

A powerful tool for scientific literature review and evidence synthesis. This skill searches a curated database of full-text scientific papers, going beyond traditional abstracts. It extracts and returns highly structured, quantitative data, including methodologies, quantitative results, sample sizes, quality scores, and 25+ metadata fields per paper, making it ideal for meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

An autonomous research agent that plans complex investigations using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). It executes sub-questions in parallel, performs gap analysis, and iteratively refines findings before synthesizing a comprehensive, structured report. Ideal for deep market analysis, academic literature reviews, or complex problem-solving requiring multiple data sources.

A systematic tool for scientific inquiry, guiding users through the entire research process. It helps formulate testable, mechanistic hypotheses from raw observations or preliminary data, following the established scientific method. The workflow includes comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, generating competing explanations, and designing experiments, all while mandating the creation of scientific schematics for visualization.

A comprehensive mentor guiding users through the entire lifecycle of academic literature reviews. It teaches systematic search strategies (PICO/PCC), critical appraisal methods, and advanced synthesis techniques. The skill covers searching major English and Chinese databases (e.g., PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI), organizing findings, and effectively utilizing AI research tools like Elicit and Semantic Scholar to build robust, evidence-based research papers.

This skill performs a structured Systematic Literature Review (SLR) by analyzing multiple academic papers on a given topic. It searches academic databases (like arXiv), extracts structured metadata (research questions, methodologies, key findings, limitations) from the entire set of papers, and synthesizes overarching themes and research trends. It is ideal for creating comprehensive literature surveys, annotated bibliographies, and cross-paper comparisons, outputting reports in professional citation formats like APA, IEEE, or BibTeX.

This skill synthesizes user signals gathered from diverse sources—such as interviews, support tickets, NPS verbatims, app reviews, and sales calls—into a single, weighted, and comprehensive insight brief. It moves beyond surface-level feature requests to surface the core underlying user needs, identifies contradictions (divergence), and assigns confidence ratings based on source diversity and weight. Ideal for product managers and UX researchers needing to reconcile complex, mixed data sets.