Skill UI

This example demonstrates unsafe or malicious review data inputs, specifically designed for calibration and security testing. It simulates prompt injection attacks and must only be used in controlled environments to validate secure data processing and system robustness.

A comprehensive guide for preparing scholarly manuscripts involving spatial data. It outlines best practices for documenting data provenance (sources, projections, processing chains), ensuring reproducibility, and adhering to critical ethical standards such as geoprivacy and human-subjects protection. Essential for maintaining research integrity in academic publishing.

A guide for researchers submitting to conferences like ACM Multimedia, detailing how to achieve robust result reproducibility. It covers the necessary steps—including logging code commits, data versions, media preprocessing parameters, and hardware details—to allow independent reviewers to successfully rebuild the reported findings and achieve official reproducibility badges.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in electronics and signal processing preparing submissions to Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It outlines best practices for proactively structuring, documenting, and disclosing research artifacts—including code, datasets, and hardware designs—to maximize the paper's credibility and chances of acceptance, even without mandatory journal badges. Covers anonymization, reproducibility standards, and proper disclosure in the manuscript.

This guide provides comprehensive best practices for ensuring scientific reproducibility in technical papers, particularly for electronics and information processing fields. It covers the critical pillars of documentation: environment setup, data sourcing and preprocessing, full algorithmic disclosure (including pseudo-code and hyperparameters), and robust statistical evaluation. By adopting these standards, authors can transform their work from potentially unverifiable results into credible, verifiable scientific contributions suitable for top-tier journals.

This skill guides authors on how to position, structure, and strengthen empirical Natural Language Processing (NLP) manuscripts for submission to the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). It provides deep insights into conference fit, required evidence (baselines, error analysis, datasets), proper framing, and anticipating reviewer expectations for top-tier AI venues.

This skill automatically converts structured data from Excel (.xlsx) workbooks into a clean, readable Markdown format. It is essential for enabling accurate analysis, summarization, and data extraction of spreadsheet contents, especially when the user asks to 'read', 'analyze', or 'compare' data without specifying a conversion method. It supports both single files and batch processing of entire folders.

This skill converts Portable Document Format (.pdf) files into Markdown format, making the content easily analyzable, summarized, searchable, or extracted. It is designed to handle various user requests involving PDFs, such as summarizing reports, extracting data, or processing folders of documents. It can also be invoked alongside sibling skills for batch processing mixed file types (PDF, DOCX, XLSX).

This skill converts Microsoft Word documents (.docx) into Markdown format. It is essential for accurately analyzing, summarizing, or extracting data from proprietary Word files, as direct parsing is unreliable. It supports single files, batch processing of folders, and is designed to coordinate with sibling skills (PDF and Excel) when handling mixed document types to ensure no data is skipped.

This comprehensive guide outlines the rigorous standards for designing, auditing, and reporting Natural Language Processing (NLP) experiments, specifically tailored for top-tier academic conferences like EMNLP. It covers critical areas including baseline fairness checks, data contamination audits, statistical significance testing, prompt sensitivity analysis, and structured human evaluation protocols, ensuring reported claims are robust, reproducible, and methodologically sound.

A comprehensive guide for generating and packaging reproducible evidence for signal processing submissions to ICASSP. It details what reviewers prioritize (scoring scripts, dataset splits, logs) and outlines best practices to ensure that headline metrics are easily regenerated, thereby maximizing review credibility and post-publication impact.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting signal processing papers, detailing how to achieve rigorous reproducibility for conferences like ICASSP. It emphasizes that simply providing a model is insufficient; authors must pin down the 'scoring ruler,' data versions, front-end parameters, and computational seeds to ensure every reported metric can be independently verified.