Skill UI

This comprehensive workflow guides researchers through the entire academic publication lifecycle for submissions to the Chinese Journal of Management Science. It acts as a critical router, ensuring manuscripts cover essential stages: topic selection, advanced model formulation, algorithm design, empirical validation (out-of-sample testing), and generating actionable managerial insights. It helps prevent common pitfalls like lacking empirical depth or misaligning with the journal's core focus on applied modeling.

This skill serves as a comprehensive guide for authors submitting papers to Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics (CPAM). It helps authors assess the theoretical depth, mathematical rigor, and suitability of their work—especially in PDEs, analysis, and mathematical physics—for a top-tier journal. It covers scope fitting, proof standards, and submission best practices.

This guide provides an in-depth understanding of the peer-review process for Conservation Biology, covering double-blind review standards, editorial screening criteria, and expert review priorities. It teaches authors how to structure their research to explicitly demonstrate conservation relevance, novelty, and transferable implications, effectively stress-testing a manuscript against common desk-rejection grounds.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for positioning and refining academic manuscripts intended for the 'Contemporary Economy of Japan' journal. It specializes in comparative economics, focusing on Japanese macroeconomics, Sino-Japanese trade, regional cooperation, and policy implications for China's development. It guides users on meeting specific structural requirements, theoretical depth, and evidence standards (e.g., country data, comparative framework).

This comprehensive guide is a fit and re-framing tool for authors targeting Developmental Cell. It details the journal's high standards for mechanistic studies spanning developmental and cell biology. It emphasizes that advances must go beyond mere phenotypes, requiring rigorous molecular mechanisms, quantified live imaging data, and adherence to STAR Methods. Use this to assess if your work meets the required depth and scope.

A comprehensive skill guide for authors assessing whether their pure mathematics manuscript meets the high standards of the Duke Mathematical Journal. It details required rigor, depth, novelty, and structural elements, helping researchers benchmark their work before final submission to a top-tier general math journal.

This skill is a comprehensive guide for authors targeting top-tier academic journals, such as Econometrica. It provides a rigorous checklist covering the required depth of econometric theory, the novelty of identification results, structural modeling requirements, and the necessary formal structure (proofs, asymptotics, supplementary materials). Use this tool to re-frame and vet manuscripts against the highest academic standards.

A comprehensive skill tool designed to guide authors on submitting manuscripts to *Economic Perspectives*. It helps users evaluate if their work meets the journal's high standards for theoretical depth, economic mechanism explanation, and scholarly rigor. It covers structure, scope, and common rejection pitfalls, serving as a pre-submission quality check.

This guide serves as a comprehensive fit check for manuscripts targeting the journal Economic Policy. It outlines the journal's unique positioning as a leading European policy-oriented venue, emphasizing rigorous yet accessible analysis. It provides detailed guidance on the Panel presentation route, scope limitations (European/international policy questions), required methodological depth, and house style conventions, ensuring the paper is policy-relevant rather than merely theoretical.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors aiming to submit to *Economist*, a prominent theoretical economics journal. It analyzes the journal's scope—focusing on Chinese modernization, macro policy, and development—and helps authors refine their paper's theoretical depth, methodological rigor, and overall structure to meet high publication standards. It guides the structuring of the argument, identifies common rejection risks, and suggests potential alternative venues.

This tool helps researchers diagnose whether their empirical or theoretical result meets the high standards required for top-tier academic journals like Econometrica. It guides users to evaluate the generality, methodological novelty, and theoretical depth of their work, ensuring the contribution is a generalizable estimator or theorem, not merely an application.

A comprehensive router designed to guide researchers through the entire lifecycle of writing a highly rigorous academic paper for top-tier econometrics journals, such as Econometrica. It outlines the necessary steps—from initial topic selection and theoretical positioning to detailed identification checks, robustness testing, and final submission package assembly—ensuring the manuscript meets the highest standards of mathematical rigor and scholarly depth. This guide does not replace specialized skills but dictates the optimal sequence of research stages.