Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting top Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) conferences like CHI. It helps authors position their manuscripts, define required contribution types (e.g., system, dataset, empirical finding), and structure the paper to meet the rigorous standards of human-centered computing reviewers, focusing on user experience and design implication.

A comprehensive guide for authors assessing the fit of their computer science manuscript for the ACM CSCW conference. It provides expert advice on positioning, required evidence (empirical depth, design implications), scope vocabulary (collaboration systems, social platforms), and structuring the paper to maximize acceptance chances in social computing venues.

This guide helps researchers strategically position their manuscripts for top-tier venues like ACM DIS. It provides deep insight into the required scope, contribution types (e.g., design artifacts, methods, theory), evidence standards (e.g., controlled study, field deployment), and necessary framing adjustments to ensure the work aligns perfectly with the conference's community expectations. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and submission strategy.

This guide details how to construct a sophisticated and rigorous robustness suite for top-tier academic econometrics journals (e.g., AEJ: Applied). It moves beyond simple regression tables, providing targeted checks against common methodological threats such as omitted variables, specification search, functional form choices, and incorrect statistical inference. The goal is to systematically demonstrate that the main point estimate is stable, reliable, and not an artifact of the research design.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for authors submitting academic manuscripts to the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) via the AEA system. It ensures compliance with single-blind review policies, covering abstract word limits, JEL coding, data/code availability requirements, formatting, and fee confirmation before final submission.

This skill provides a comprehensive, end-to-end workflow guide for academic journal submissions, specifically tailored for Acta Electronica Sinica (AES). It maps the entire publishing journey—from topic selection and research design to submission, review tracking, revision, and final publication—into a structured timeline. It helps authors manage complex decision points, adhere to strict deadlines (like the 6-month response window), and avoid common pitfalls, ensuring a systematic approach to high-stakes scholarly publishing.

This guide provides rigorous guidelines for creating high-quality figures and tables for complex systems manuscripts, especially in agricultural science. It emphasizes shifting focus from single-factor bar charts to systemic visualizations that reveal interactions, trade-offs (e.g., Pareto fronts), model dynamics, resource flows (Sankey diagrams), and model performance (observed-vs-simulated fit). Exhibits must be self-contained, reproducible, and convey uncertainty.

This framework provides a rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and comprehensive academic syntheses. It guides researchers through building transparent coverage, designing robust coding matrices, and choosing the correct integration method (narrative, systematic, or bibliometric) to move beyond simple summarization and create an auditable intellectual map of a field.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of writing a comprehensive, integrative review article for the Academy of Management Annals. It is designed to help users sequence their work—from initial topic selection and creating a formal proposal (the gate) to systematic literature synthesis, building an organizing framework, and final revision. It emphasizes the critical, authoritative 'Annals voice' required for field-advancing academic reviews.

This guide assists researchers in strengthening the methodological rigor of academic work, particularly in political science. It provides structured methods for defending research design, covering rigorous causal identification for quantitative work (e.g., DiD, IV, RDD) and systematic case selection/process tracing for qualitative analysis. Use this when facing reviewer skepticism or preparing a pre-analysis plan to ensure the evidence credibly connects to the theoretical argument.

A comprehensive guide for researchers and reviewers designing or auditing Automated Software Engineering (ASE) evaluations. It outlines the necessary rigor, including the use of real subject systems, establishing fair and runnable tool baselines, performing targeted ablations (especially for LLMs), defining explicit oracles, and ensuring full data and model provenance to guarantee reproducible and scientifically sound results.

This guide provides expert principles for designing and auditing system-level experiments in computer architecture (e.g., for ASPLOS-level conferences). It details the proper usage of various instruments—from real silicon and FPGAs to cycle-level simulators and analytical models—ensuring that every claim is matched to a valid, stated error model. It emphasizes workload selection, establishing strong baselines, performing rigorous ablation studies, and honestly reporting measurement noise and limitations to maintain scientific credibility.