Skill UI

This tool acts as an orchestrator for Developmental Psychology submissions, guiding authors through the entire academic writing lifecycle. It helps users systematize their work from initial conceptualization and defining developmental claims (age effects, within-person change) to selecting the appropriate design (cross-sectional, longitudinal, micro-genetic), conducting rigorous analysis, and fulfilling modern standards like APA 7th and Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP). It maps the full journey from idea to rebuttal.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for creating a robust, reproducible artifact package for database systems research. It details best practices including containerization, pinning workloads, generating a permanent DOI-archived record, and designing the package to be successfully built and demonstrated on a reviewer's clean machine within a tight time budget. The goal is to strengthen scientific rigor and ensure permanent, open-access citation.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for designing, auditing, and reporting empirical evaluations in database systems research. It emphasizes the principle that evidence must proportionally match the claim, requiring the use of real-world workloads, fair and tuned baselines, thorough measurement of variance and state (warm/cold), and fully reproducible evaluation harnesses. It also outlines the higher bar for 'Experiments & Analysis' papers.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for designing rigorous, falsifiable system evaluations for academic research papers. It details best practices across four critical evidence layers: end-to-end performance, mechanism decomposition, operational cost, and boundary testing. Learn how to ensure workload realism, maintain baseline fairness, structure your experiment matrix, and avoid common pitfalls to meet top-tier systems research standards.

This router guides researchers through the systematic process of preparing a manuscript for Experimental Economics (ExpEcon), the ESA's flagship journal. It identifies the correct specialized skills (e.g., theory modeling, robustness checks, referee strategy, rebuttal) needed at each stage, ensuring adherence to methodological rigor, including incentive compatibility and the no-deception norm. It is designed to help teams structure their research from initial design to final submission.

A comprehensive methodology for designing scientific and reproducible storage evaluations, particularly for high-stakes submissions. This guide covers controlling device state (aging, preconditioning, TRIM), selecting credible workloads (fio, YCSB), matching metrics (P99.9 latency, bytes-written) to claims, and rigorously testing durability and crash consistency on real hardware.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for designing and auditing empirical studies in software engineering (SE). It emphasizes that evidence must proportionally match the claims made, covering topics like using real subject systems, establishing fair baselines, calculating SE-standard statistics (effect sizes, CIs), and ensuring thorough provenance, especially for LLM-based work. It helps researchers strengthen their research methodology before publication.

This guide details the rigorous academic publication review process for Human Resource Management (HRM). It explains the multi-stage journey from EIC screening and double-blind peer review to the final decision letter. It is designed to help researchers interpret complex outcomes (Major/Minor Revision or Reject) and, crucially, to systematically map reviewer comments into actionable revisions, thereby maximizing the chances of successful resubmission.

A comprehensive guide for designing and auditing empirical experiments in signal processing, audio, and speech domains. It emphasizes matching standard metrics (e.g., WER, SI-SDR, PSNR) to specific tasks, establishing current strong baselines, and systematically sweeping operating conditions (like SNR or reverberation time) to ensure robust, reliable, and publication-ready results.

A methodology guide for structuring high-stakes academic research experiments, particularly for top-tier CV conferences (like ICCV). It emphasizes systematic planning under strict deadlines, covering benchmark drift audits, ensuring fairness by accounting for pretraining confounds, structuring ablations to isolate mechanisms, and strategically sequencing runs to maximize impact before the submission deadline.

This guide provides comprehensive standards for designing, executing, and reporting systems experiments for top-tier academic venues (like ICDE). It emphasizes methodological rigor, including mandatory ablation studies, reporting variance and tail latency (p99), demonstrating scaling trends (curves over points), disclosing cost trade-offs, and ensuring full hardware and software reproducibility to withstand adversarial review.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed for authors submitting data-engineering systems papers to major conferences like ICDE. It covers critical areas including IEEE formatting standards, round selection strategy, Microsoft CMT conflict declarations, and the requirement for supplemental material, ensuring authors mitigate common desk-reject risks.