Skill UI

This guide outlines best practices for Nature Geoscience authors, detailing how to separate essential narrative (Main Text) from comprehensive, reproducible documentation (Online Methods). It emphasizes grounding every quantitative claim, quantifying uncertainty, and ensuring full data and code availability to meet high academic standards and pass rigorous peer review.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in Pervasive Computing on ensuring the verifiable and reproducible nature of sensing data-driven claims. It mandates strict documentation practices covering dataset availability statements, sensing provenance (devices, labeling, preprocessing), cross-subject evaluation (LOSO), and consistency between published results and source data, adhering to ethical guidelines.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting academic research papers to major conferences like PerCom. Covers critical steps including adhering to IEEE formatting standards, managing the two-step registration and submission deadlines, ensuring double-blind anonymity (leak detection), and providing necessary open-data and institutional ethics documentation. Essential for ensuring submissions meet high academic publication standards.

This guide provides authors with comprehensive best practices for submitting research artifacts (e.g., compilers, benchmarks, proofs) for post-acceptance evaluation at PLDI. It details how to structure the submission, ensuring reproducibility, containerization, and clear documentation to achieve Functional, Reusable, or Available badges.

This comprehensive guide outlines the requirements for submitting computational artifacts for post-acceptance evaluation at PPoPP. It details PPoPP's unique badge policy (Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced), addresses the challenges of ensuring results reproduce across different hardware architectures, and provides a detailed packaging plan, including containerization, README structure, and provenance documentation for maximizing reproducibility.

This guide outlines the necessary steps to ensure that parallel computing performance papers are scientifically reproducible. Since parallel results depend heavily on machine architecture, topology, and runtime conditions, proper documentation must cover everything from CPU/GPU specifications and interconnects to thread pinning policies, random seeds, and compiler flags. The focus is on proving the scaling trend, not just the absolute numbers, allowing results to hold true across different hardware platforms.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors adopting open science standards, based on TOP Guidelines. It outlines best practices for ensuring research reproducibility, covering data citation, data provenance documentation, data sharing via repositories (Dataverse/QDR), and managing restricted-data paths for various evidence types.

This guide outlines the rigorous requirements for preparing a reproducible package for Quantitative Economics (QE) journal submissions. It details the strict standards set by the Econometric Society Data Editor, covering raw data, code, documentation, and handling complex data exemptions to ensure the submission passes the pre-acceptance reproducibility check (DCAS compliant).

This guide establishes the rigorous policy for submitting computational and empirical papers to academic journals. It mandates that authors provide sufficient data, source code, and detailed documentation (including execution order, random seeds, and OS used) to ensure that research findings can be fully reproduced by others, adhering to global standards like Option C.

This guide outlines the best practices for preparing system artifacts for academic evaluation, following the ACM Artifact Review and Badging scheme. It details how authors must ensure reproducibility, especially for tail latency and cost results, by providing scaled-down testbeds, comprehensive documentation, and clear provenance tracking to satisfy conference evaluators.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to SCI journals, detailing best practices for making research code and data available. It addresses how to proactively provide reproducible materials, structured documentation, and honest availability statements, even when formal 'Artifact Evaluation' badges are not mandatory. It helps authors improve the robustness and impact of their scientific findings.

This guide details best practices for achieving high standards of reproducibility in visual analytics papers, focusing on open materials, verifiable code, and rigorous documentation. It covers mapping figures to data sources, preregistering studies, documenting data provenance, and defining the level of reproducibility achieved (e.g., turnkey, scripted).