Skill UI

This skill assists researchers in assessing the suitability of their experimental robotics manuscript for the International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER). It provides detailed guidance on conference fit, required experimental evidence, scope re-framing, and positioning relative to other major robotics venues, ensuring the work emphasizes real-world validation and empirical findings.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID). This skill helps authors optimize their paper's positioning, strengthen the evidence chain (focusing on operational relevance and realistic evaluation), and structure submissions to meet the rigorous standards of top-tier cybersecurity conferences, thereby maximizing acceptance chances. It covers scope alignment, contribution types, and structural best practices.

A comprehensive guide for authors positioning robotics research papers for top-tier conferences like ISRR. It helps assess scope fit, define the required evidence bar, re-frame content from journal/arXiv styles, and strategically compare the manuscript against similar venues (e.g., CoRL, ICRA). Ideal for optimizing conference submission strategy in embodied intelligence and foundational robotics.

This skill guides authors on how to strategically position their research for the INTERSPEECH conference. It covers core topics such as speech recognition, synthesis, paralinguistics, and audio-language modeling. Use it to re-frame manuscripts from journal or arXiv styles into a selective CS conference narrative, ensuring the work meets the rigorous standards of audio-specific evaluation, datasets, and error analysis expected by the field.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting work to INTERSPEECH. It details how to package and manage various artifacts—including code, audio samples, and trained models—through the conference lifecycle. The document emphasizes maintaining anonymity during review, ensuring scientific reproducibility, managing complex data licenses, and adhering to ethical guidelines for voice data and synthetic media release.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing rebuttals to multiple reviewers at INTERSPEECH. It provides strategic advice on tailoring responses to diverse expert profiles (e.g., speech engineers vs. scientists), managing the 4-page constraint, maintaining anonymity, and structuring responses to maximize impact on the meta-reviewer. Essential for authors navigating the competitive academic publication process.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing camera-ready papers for the INTERSPEECH conference. It covers critical steps like de-anonymizing content, ensuring accurate metadata linking (DOI/ISCA Archive), meeting author registration requirements for proceedings inclusion, and planning oral or poster presentations.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing, evaluating, and reporting experimental results in speech processing research (ASR, TTS, Speaker Verification, etc.). It details required metrics (WER, MOS, EER), establishing robust baselines, conducting significance testing (bootstrap, CI), and ensuring comprehensive condition coverage (speakers, noise, languages) to enhance the scientific rigor of academic submissions.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting to major speech conferences (like INTERSPEECH). It details how to harden the reproducibility of speech results, covering crucial 'decay channels' such as corpus versions, text normalization rules (WER), objective metrics (EER), subjective protocols (MOS), and model stochasticity. The guide emphasizes pinning specific toolkits, commit hashes, configurations, and hardware details to ensure scientific rigor and verifiability.

This comprehensive guide details the end-to-end technical program committee (TPC) review process for major academic conferences like INTERSPEECH. It walks through every stage—from initial submission and area assignment to independent review, rebuttal, meta-review, and final decision. Users can learn how to decode reviewer feedback, understand the limitations of the rebuttal, and develop a strategic plan for future submissions and research refinement.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for the INTERSPEECH conference. This audit checklist covers critical aspects including strict 4-page formatting compliance, maintaining double-anonymous status throughout the review period, meticulous metadata handling (CMT fields), and navigating the specific paper update windows and potential desk-reject triggers.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to package and present supplementary evidence for INTERSPEECH submissions. It clarifies the difference between core reviewed content and optional accompaniment (audio demos, extended analyses), emphasizing that the main paper must stand alone. Learn best practices for audio curation, layout, and navigating the 'three shelves' structure to maximize impact during the review process.