Skill UI

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for targeting and revising academic manuscripts for the journal World Economic Studies. It analyzes the journal's scope, focusing on globalization, open strategy, international trade, and regional economics. It guides users on required advanced methodologies (e.g., GVC decomposition, panel data), structural mandates, and common submission pitfalls to ensure manuscripts meet high academic standards.

This guide outlines the rigorous standards for establishing causal claims in development economics and social sciences. It covers robust quantitative methods (like DID, IV, RDD, RCT) and structured qualitative/mixed-methods approaches. The core principle is that the logical route from evidence to claim must be explicitly defensible and matched to the strength of the assertion, avoiding over-claiming.

This guide helps researchers position their work within the broader, multidisciplinary development conversation. It teaches how to move beyond simply presenting new data or techniques, focusing instead on bridging disciplines (e.g., economics and political science) and identifying the core conceptual contribution that a non-specialist can grasp. It is crucial for manuscripts aiming for high-impact development journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions following peer review at top-tier journals (e.g., World Development). It teaches how to structure the rebuttal letter, synthesize conflicting referee demands (methodology vs. context), and strategically triage feedback—conceding, strengthening, or defending—to maximize the chance of publication.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to World Development (WD) and similar cross-disciplinary journals. It helps authors anticipate and proactively address the diverse and often conflicting objections from double-anonymized, multidisciplinary reviewers (e.g., methodologists vs. contextualists). The strategy covers strengthening methodology, embedding clear development contributions, and structuring the argument to minimize rejection risk.

A comprehensive guide for preparing replication and transparency packages for World Development manuscripts. It provides checklists and best practices for both quantitative (code reproducibility, data provenance, de-identification) and qualitative (evidence-to-claim trail, methods appendix) research. It addresses ethical constraints and the unique challenges of double-anonymized review.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with structured frameworks for assessing robustness and trustworthiness in World Development manuscripts. It guides users to organize checks by identifying specific threats (e.g., specification dependence, measurement error) in quantitative work, or demonstrating methodological rigor (e.g., triangulation, negative-case analysis) in qualitative work. It ensures findings are thoroughly vetted against alternative explanations.

A comprehensive guide designed for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to World Development (WD) via Elsevier Editorial Manager. This checklist ensures authors complete the required steps for double-anonymization, verify abstract/keyword limits, and properly include all necessary declarations (e.g., funding, ethics, conflict of interest) before final submission.

This guide provides best practices for optimizing the presentation of data exhibits—including tables, figures, and qualitative displays—in development economics manuscripts. It ensures that complex findings are highly legible and actionable for a multidisciplinary, policy-oriented audience, moving beyond simple statistical reporting to communicate clear, impactful narratives.

This guide helps researchers move beyond decorative theory to construct 'load-bearing' conceptual or analytical frameworks for World Development (WD) manuscripts. It outlines how to transform vague ideas into structured, testable mechanisms by stating clear mechanisms, deriving discriminating predictions, mapping predictions to evidence, and defining scope conditions, ensuring the theory actively drives the empirical argument.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for researchers to assess if their development-related work is suitable for World Development (WD). It moves beyond mere methodological rigor, focusing instead on the paper's multidisciplinary relevance, real-world policy stakes, and ability to advance global understanding of development problems (e.g., poverty, governance, inequality). It helps authors ensure their findings appeal to a broad academic and policy audience.

This router is designed to guide researchers through the complex, multidisciplinary workflow of writing a manuscript for World Development (WD). It helps users determine the correct next step—whether the paper is quantitative, purely qualitative, or mixed-methods—at every stage, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to robust revision, rebuttal, and final submission. It ensures the work meets the high bar of real-world development relevance.