Skill UI

This skill details how to monitor Certificate Transparency (CT) logs using industry tools like crt.sh and Certstream. By analyzing publicly issued SSL/TLS certificates, users can proactively detect lookalike domains, unauthorized certificate issuance for owned assets, and early-stage phishing infrastructure targeting their organization. Ideal for SOC analysts and threat hunters.

This template simulates a hand-drawn, low-fidelity wireframe session on a whiteboard or sketchpad. It includes graph paper backgrounds, marker scribbles, sticky notes, and multiple tabs, making it ideal for early-stage UI/UX brainstorming and capturing initial conceptual ideas.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets). This skill helps determine conference fit, refine manuscript framing, and assess the evidence required for early-stage networking ideas and provocative systems. It serves as a crucial tool for submission strategy, ensuring the paper is tailored for a selective CS conference audience.

A specialized tool for polishing pure mathematics manuscripts, designed to enhance the rigor and overall flow of academic writing. It guides authors to eliminate soft language (e.g., "clearly," "obviously"), ensure precise quantification, explicitly state constant dependencies, and structure hypotheses meticulously. Ideal for late-stage proof refinement before journal submission.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complete academic review pipeline for IEEE/ACM Automated Software Engineering (ASE) submissions. It explains unique stages like the early-rejection gate, the criteria-bound revision process, and the difference between ASE's cycle and those of peer conferences (e.g., ICSE, FSE). Essential reading for authors aiming to submit high-quality research in automatic software engineering.

This guide models the complex and rigorous two-stage filtering process for submissions to the CAV conference. It details the partial double-anonymity, the core evaluation criteria (significance, soundness, novelty), and provides strategic advice on how authors should structure their paper to withstand early rejection, and how to use the rebuttal phase effectively.

This guide assists authors in late-stage polishing of manuscripts intended for Human Resource Management (HRM) journals. It focuses on establishing a 'dual-audience voice' that simultaneously satisfies scholarly rigor and practical applicability. Learn how to structure the abstract and introduction to clearly present both the theoretical advance and the actionable, real-world takeaway for HR practitioners.

This guide helps authors refine their academic manuscripts for submission to the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB). It focuses on transforming technically correct but policy-distant writing into a compelling narrative that clearly articulates the economic stakes, policy implications, and magnitude of findings for central bankers and regulators. Ideal for late-stage polishing.

An essential orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitting to specialized journals. This router guides authors through the entire publishing lifecycle—from initial idea generation and literature positioning to final submission and rebuttal. It assesses the article's scope (Research Article vs. Short Article), manages page limitations, and ensures early focus on data replicability, directing users to the precise sub-skill needed at any stage.

This skill acts as an expert orchestrator and router for authors preparing submissions to the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART). It guides users through the entire academic lifecycle, from initial topic selection to final rebuttal. Crucially, it enforces JPART's defining gate: the paper must demonstrate a clear contribution to public-management theory, rather than just presenting strong empirical findings or policy recommendations. Ideal for early-stage conceptualization or when feedback suggests the work lacks theoretical depth.

Provides a comprehensive guide to navigating the complex two-round review process of MobiCom. It details key stages, from early rejection and rebuttal windows to one-shot revision, and advises authors on strategic actions and best practices at each point to maximize the chances of acceptance.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured workflow for academic submissions to the NDSS security symposium. It maps out the distinct summer and fall submission cycles, detailing critical milestones from the initial paper deadline through early-reject, rebuttal, notification, and final camera-ready stages. It emphasizes strategic backward planning, managing the sensitive disclosure clock for vulnerabilities, and positioning research within the broader security research lifecycle.