Skill UI

This tool guides researchers on whether their academic topic aligns with the scope of an empirical microeconomics journal, specifically the Journal of Human Resources (JHR). It emphasizes that the research must focus on policy-relevant, causal questions in core fields (e.g., labor, health, education), strictly differentiating it from purely organizational behavior or 'HR management' studies. It serves as a critical gatekeeper before formal submission.

A specialized tool for applied microeconomists to assess the suitability of their empirical work—covering labor, education, health, and welfare—for the Journal of Human Resources (JHR). It evaluates the paper's fit, methodological rigor, identification strategy, and policy relevance, providing actionable advice on framing and alternative submissions.

This guide targets the Journal of Physical Education, a CSSCI-level journal emphasizing school physical education, sport humanities, and social science. It is ideal for researchers studying PE reform, youth fitness, and sport policy. Submissions must demonstrate strong theoretical grounding and problem consciousness, analyzing educational, social, or health mechanisms rather than merely summarizing teaching experiences.

This guide provides detailed standards and strategies for submitting research to high-level, comprehensive CSSCI sports journals. It covers best practices for structuring studies across diverse sub-fields, including athletic training, exercise science, sports sociology, and physical education, emphasizing the necessity of robust methodology, solid evidence, and clear disciplinary contribution.

This guide details submission requirements for the Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University, a comprehensive CSSCI journal. It covers the full spectrum of sport science, including training, exercise physiology, sport humanities, and school PE. It is ideal for well-evidenced studies needing a broad, standardized venue, emphasizing strong problem consciousness and empirical rigor.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors submitting to the Review of Educational Research (RER). It helps authors anticipate reviewer and editor expectations, framing their work as a significant advance rather than a simple summary. The guide covers rigorous methodological standards, addressing predictable objections (e.g., search incompleteness, coding reliability) and ensuring the manuscript is appropriately positioned relative to other academic venues.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses, particularly in educational research. It ensures the reproducibility and defensibility of the evidence corpus by documenting the entire PRISMA flow, from exhaustive multi-database searching and dual screening to structured data extraction and subsequent synthesis of findings.

A comprehensive guide for developing a rigorous, a-priori protocol for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in educational research. This tool ensures methodological transparency by defining the scope (PICO), eligibility criteria, search strategies, screening procedures, and synthesis plans before any data is collected, protecting the integrity of the research findings.

Provides a structured framework for vetting potential review topics for high-impact educational journals. It guides researchers through four critical fit tests—educational importance, literature maturity, current need for synthesis, and scope tractability—before committing to a full search or writing a protocol, ensuring the proposal genuinely advances academic understanding.

This skill converts unstructured documents (PDF, EPUB, DOCX, etc.) into actionable, structured agent skills. Instead of providing simple summaries, it deep-dives to extract core frameworks, mental models, key principles, techniques, and anti-patterns from educational material. Use this when you need to transform academic knowledge into a reusable, machine-readable toolkit for agents like Copilot CLI, Amp, or Claude Code.

A sophisticated framework designed to simulate complex legal interactions across various domains, including tenancy law, business contracts, startup disputes, and employment claims. This tool is ideal for demonstrating AI-powered legal triage systems, training personnel on responsible AI use, or creating realistic proof-of-concepts for legal technology presentations. Note: This skill is strictly for educational and demonstration purposes and does not provide legal advice.

This tool generates self-contained, interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex legal regulations into actionable negotiation and reference guides. It systematically distinguishes between mandatory legal obligations and negotiable implementation choices, making it crucial for contract negotiation support, client education, or internal compliance training across various jurisdictions.