Skill UI

This guide outlines best practices for developing self-contained, rigorous tables and figures for empirical academic research, particularly in accounting. It covers the complete exhibit set—including variable definitions, descriptive statistics, main results, and advanced diagnostic plots (e.g., DiD event-time plots)—ensuring the work withstands intense academic scrutiny.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the mandatory submission process for the Review of Finance (RoF). It covers crucial details including fee structures (Regular vs. Fast-Track), manuscript length (60-page cap), abstract word limits, formatting standards, double-blind anonymity requirements, Chicago citation style, and necessary ethical disclosures. Use this guide before uploading to prevent desk rejection.

A comprehensive, final preflight checklist designed for submitting scientific manuscripts to top-tier journals. It ensures every critical element—from statistical rigor, data availability, and ethical compliance to formatting, figures, and references—is fully resolved, preventing editorial rejection or major revisions upon initial submission.

A specialized guide for researchers assessing manuscript suitability for securities and capital market journals. It analyzes the journal's positioning, preferred topics (e.g., market regulation, corporate governance, asset pricing), required methodologies (e.g., DID, event studies), and common submission pitfalls. Use this skill to structure your paper and improve its fit before formal submission.

Provides detailed guidelines for authors submitting manuscripts to academic journals, specifically addressing the strict limit of 10 tables and figure panels, along with a 10-page supplementary cap. This guide teaches authors how to critically select, consolidate, and present key research results—such as marginal effects, event studies, or decomposition plots—to ensure every exhibit is self-contained, highly clear, and robust enough to pass expert review.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to ACM SoCC (Symposium on Cloud Computing). It covers critical aspects including the unique two-round deadlines, strict ACM formatting (12/6 pages, acmart template), dual-anonymous review requirements, identity leak prevention, and ensuring systems/data reproducibility posture before submission.

A comprehensive guide for specifying the scope, domain, and inherent limits of a sociological theory (ST). This framework teaches how to move beyond mere disclaimers by articulating boundaries as strong theoretical claims. It guides the user to define boundaries across three dimensions: substantive scope (what phenomena are covered), level scope (micro, macro, meso), and contextual/historical scope (under what conditions the theory applies). Defining these bounds strengthens the theory by preventing overreach.

This framework guides researchers to evaluate whether their current manuscript meets the high academic standards of top-tier comprehensive journals (e.g., Social Sciences in China). It moves beyond technical sophistication, focusing instead on the depth of intellectual contribution, originality of theory, and the macro-level significance of the research problem, preventing mis-submission and guiding revision strategy.

Guidelines for ensuring academic proofs are completely verifiable by third parties, especially when theorems are distributed across multiple documents (e.g., extended abstract and full version). It emphasizes single-source builds, preventing statement drift, and detailing computational determinism requirements for maximum rigor in theoretical computer science research.

This skill details the rigorous process of converting raw statistical outputs into self-contained, publication-ready tables and figures for top-tier academic journals. It ensures compliance with strict house styles, covering sample selection, descriptive statistics, main regression results, and specific formatting for DiD, RDD, and event studies, all while adhering to strict page limits and providing economic magnitude interpretation.

A comprehensive project management layer designed for navigating the entire academic conference lifecycle. It guides authors through critical phases, including topic selection, paper drafting, rigorous review response, camera-ready submission, and final presentation. The workflow emphasizes meticulous planning, role assignment, and maintaining academic integrity to prevent common project failures.

A comprehensive audit guide for the final pre-upload submission of UIST (User Interface Software and Technology) conference papers. This document details critical steps, including adhering to strict formatting rules (e.g., two-column layout, page limits), managing the abstract and paper deadlines, and executing thorough anonymity sweeps to prevent desk rejection. Essential reading for authors preparing for major academic conferences.