Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for selecting and defending appropriate research designs—including qualitative, quantitative, experimental, and computational methods—for organizational science manuscripts. It emphasizes matching the method to the theoretical contribution and level of analysis, rather than solely focusing on causal identification. Learn how to structure your argument, ensure transparency, and build robust mechanism evidence.

A comprehensive guide for constructing rigorous and auditable exhibits (tables and figures) in academic manuscripts, particularly for Organization Studies and process modeling. Learn how to structure data-to-theory evidence tables, process models with explicit mechanisms, and data structure figures to allow reviewers to clearly trace the inference from raw data to theoretical constructs, significantly enhancing the paper's methodological rigor.

This skill automates the complex process of transforming raw research papers (PDF or URL) into structured, knowledge graph-ready resources for OpenViking. It executes a rigorous workflow: reading the entire paper, compiling an ARA-style artifact directory, validating the content against established schemas, and finally ingesting the structured data into the OpenViking knowledge base using the `ov add-resource` command. It ensures all evidence, claims, and logical relationships are captured systematically.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for positioning computer graphics, visualization, and geometric computing manuscripts for the Pacific Graphics conference. It covers conference fit evaluation, necessary framing adjustments, evidence bar construction, and strategic advice for maximizing submission success in the Asia-Pacific visual computing domain. Ideal for authors needing to refine their paper's focus for a selective CS venue.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a structured, double-blind academic rebuttal for conferences (like PerCom). This skill focuses on addressing explicit reviewer questions using only evidence already present in the submitted paper, thereby avoiding the promise of new experiments. It covers maintaining anonymity, structuring arguments, and focusing on core technical dimensions like cross-subject evaluation and metric soundness.

This guide provides strict guidelines for structuring supplementary material for PerCom conference papers. The core rule is that the main paper body (within the tight 9-page budget) must be self-contained, allowing a reviewer to make a decision without accessing the dataset or appendix. Learn how to properly partition evidence, manage page budgets, and adhere to double-blind review rules.

This comprehensive guide outlines the specific structural, stylistic, and scientific standards required for submitting papers to Pervasive Computing (PerCom) venues. It helps researchers elevate technically sound work by ensuring the narrative strongly emphasizes the real-world, human-centered contribution of the pervasive system, focusing on cross-subject evidence, rigorous limitation discussion, and adherence to strict academic page limits.

A comprehensive guide and checklist for authors targeting Physical Review Applied (PRApplied). This skill helps evaluate whether a manuscript successfully bridges fundamental physics principles (e.g., quantum, photonics, energy) with concrete technological applications, providing heuristics on scope, evidence standards, and house style for submission.

This skill guides authors on formatting and positioning manuscripts for Physical Review Letters (PRL). It is a comprehensive venue-selection and reframing tool, helping authors determine if their physics result has sufficient broad significance, immediacy, and rigor to meet PRL's high standards. It covers methodological evidence bars, required structure, cross-subfield argumentation, and best practices for pre-submission checks.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors considering submitting a large-scale, monograph-length review to Physics Reports. It covers journal positioning, required scope across all physics subfields, the rigorous evidence bar, house style, and submission checklist. Use this tool to help structure and refine an article intended to become a definitive, self-contained academic reference.

This guide provides a detailed framework for researchers to determine the most suitable venue (e.g., PLDI, POPL, OOPSLA) for their programming language or systems research paper. It guides authors on whether their core evidence lies in theoretical proofs, working implementations with benchmarks, or empirical usage studies, ensuring optimal submission routing and maximizing acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting technical papers to top compiler and systems conferences (like PLDI). It teaches how to structure an argument as a rigorous engineering case, focusing on stating the 'hard case' first, describing mechanisms rather than using adjectives, and ensuring every claim is directly backed by evidence throughout the paper.