Skill UI

This file is designated as the Japanese localization resource for the Motion UI component. It is currently under active translation and implementation. Users should refer to the original skill file for the English version or the final functional skill.

This tool is designed to manage the process of altering an existing, functional feature to meet a new desired specification. It ensures a structured workflow: first, update the existing test cases to reflect the new behavior; second, modify the underlying implementation to pass these updated tests; finally, complete through review and gated commit. Use this when the feature works but its behavior needs adjustment.

This skill orchestrates complex, behavior-preserving code refactoring. It is designed to improve code structure—such as extracting modules, eliminating duplication, or reducing nesting—without changing the core functionality. The process follows a rigorous, multi-phase gate system, ensuring existing tests remain green throughout the entire development lifecycle, culminating in a behavior-neutral commit.

This tool executes the foundational SPARC Specification Phase (Phase 1) for new features or projects. It guides the user through systematically gathering comprehensive requirements, including functional/non-functional needs, defining concrete acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then), identifying technical constraints, and mapping edge cases. It creates a robust, formalized specification document that serves as the blueprint for all subsequent design and development phases.

This tool automatically converts design screenshots or visual exports into structured, functional Vue 3 Composition API components. It supports popular UI libraries like Vant, Element Plus, and Ant Design Vue. By batch converting screenshots, it streamlines the development process from raw design assets to reusable, production-ready code, significantly boosting frontend development efficiency.

A comprehensive guide for researchers designing and auditing NLP experiments for top-tier conferences. It covers establishing defensible baselines, ensuring evaluation breadth, performing rigorous statistical tests (significance, variance), controlling for data contamination, and structuring detailed functional error analysis. Essential reading for publishing reliable AI research.

This guide details how to construct a sophisticated and rigorous robustness suite for top-tier academic econometrics journals (e.g., AEJ: Applied). It moves beyond simple regression tables, providing targeted checks against common methodological threats such as omitted variables, specification search, functional form choices, and incorrect statistical inference. The goal is to systematically demonstrate that the main point estimate is stable, reliable, and not an artifact of the research design.

This tool serves as an expert workflow router for manuscripts targeting top-tier International Relations journals. It guides authors through the entire academic writing process—from initial topic selection and theory building to data analysis, experimental design, and final submission. Its primary function is to ensure the research maintains a strong, generalizable theoretical focus on international or cross-border phenomena, rather than focusing only on domestic case studies.

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (JBES). This guide ensures authors have verified all necessary components—including the data/code supplement, conflict disclosures, and cover letter targeting—against the latest academic standards. It functions as a critical final review step before formal submission, emphasizing the need to cross-reference live journal guidelines.

A comprehensive guide for submitting research artifacts to the MobiSys Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC). It details the process for achieving three independent ACM badges (Available, Functional, Results Reproduced). Emphasis is placed on creating fully reproducible, script-first workflows, designing for hardware-optional environments, and maintaining strict anonymity during review.

This comprehensive guide assists reviewers and authors in determining the most appropriate venue for programming language research within the SIGPLAN community. It provides a detailed 'center-of-mass' test, helping categorize contributions based on whether they emphasize metatheory (POPL), performance engineering (PLDI), functional techniques (ICFCP), or the broad design scope characteristic of OOPSLA. It guides the decision-making process for academic submissions.

This guide outlines best practices for creating quantitative exhibits in dynamic macroeconomics papers. It covers crucial components like Impulse-Response Functions (IRFs), calibration tables, moment-matching results, and policy counterfactuals. The focus is on ensuring the model's mechanism and quantitative fit are clear, legible, and self-contained for expert review.