Skill UI

Provides a comprehensive guide to the entire academic publication review lifecycle, from initial submission to acceptance. It models the key stages—including editorial screening, expert review, revision, and final check—identifying critical decision criteria, common rejection reasons, and actionable leverage points for authors to significantly improve manuscript quality and navigate the publishing process.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final stages of submitting a manuscript to Physical Review Letters (PRL). It verifies critical elements including LaTeX formatting (REVTeX), article type, required supplemental material, detailed metadata, author compliance, and adherence to APS guidelines. Use this checklist as the ultimate gate before final submission to prevent common desk-return triggers.

This guide provides a structured framework for responding to reviewers and editors regarding a meta-analysis or systematic synthesis. Because such revisions often involve expanding the search, changing eligibility criteria, or adding complex bias diagnostics, the response must maintain impeccable internal statistical consistency across all tables, figures, and estimates. It ensures all methodological changes are clearly propagated and justified.

This guide provides rigorous best practices for developing and presenting theoretical economic models for top-tier journals. It emphasizes framing results with a clear economic payoff, maintaining minimal model setups, and ensuring that complex, full proofs are relegated to the online appendix. The goal is to ensure the primary economic insight remains highly visible and actionable, rather than being buried in algebraic machinery.

This comprehensive audit guide walks through the critical, multi-gate checks required for submitting academic papers to conferences like SenSys. It covers technical formatting rules (page limits, templates), administrative compliance (deadlines, author conflicts), and critically, advanced identity leak sweeping (hardware, deployment details) to ensure the paper is fully anonymous and compliant before final submission.

This guide helps researchers navigate the complex double-anonymous peer review process for sociological theory. It teaches users how to interpret confusing decision letters, identify conceptual gaps, and triage reviewer feedback based on the journal's focus on theoretical contribution, conceptual novelty, and logical soundness. It is essential for deciding if a manuscript revision (R&R) is viable.

This guide provides an end-to-end backward planning roadmap for submitting to the SODA conference. It covers the entire theoretical computation cycle, key deadlines (e.g., July submission, rebuttal period), writing milestones, rebuttal strategies, and group ownership discipline, ensuring authors navigate the complex academic publication process efficiently.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers, specifically tailored for the IEEE VIS conference cycle. It maps out all critical milestones, from initial area selection and abstract submission through to conditional acceptance revisions and final camera-ready preparation. Use this skill to responsibly plan for the annual cycle, manage reviewers' expectations, and mitigate common submission risks.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing camera-ready submissions for Web Conferences. It covers the critical pre-acceptance steps, such as de-anonymization, restoring acknowledgements, managing ACM e-rights, and submitting associated artifacts. Learn how to navigate the tight production pipeline, ensuring compliance with ACM standards and meeting strict page limits.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to evaluate if their project aligns with the niche scope of WSDM. It details the 'two-gate test' (web/social data focus and practical/principled approach) and provides a routing table to help authors determine the most appropriate conference venue (e.g., SIGIR, KDD, RecSys) for their work.

This guide details the rigorous review process for Production and Operations Management (POM), covering departmental screening, double-blind peer review, and the strict evaluation standards. It explains the 'twin standard' (scholarly rigor and managerial relevance), how to interpret decision letters (R&R vs. Reject), and the critical rules governing resubmission, helping authors navigate the publishing journey.

This SDK allows asynchronous Python programming to control a live web browser, simulating user interactions for web automation, testing, and data extraction. Users can navigate pages, locate elements, fill forms, click buttons, and capture snapshots of the current page's content. It enforces a 'perceive → act → verify' cycle, making it ideal for building robust web scrapers and end-to-end testing tools.